Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VICR vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
VICR vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $12.64B | $55.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 57.3% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 101.2x | 65.7x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $403M | $772M |
VICR vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 459.7 | +359.7% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 214.5 | +114.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VICR vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 29.5% 10Y total return vs MCHP's 375.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.79, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 8.99x
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 1.8%
- Beta 1.70, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.59x
- Lower P/E (65.7x vs 101.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (65.7x vs 101.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs MCHP's +121.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8% |
VICR vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VICR vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 9.7x VICR's $453M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, MCHP holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.3% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MCHP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MCHP's 57.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VICR's 212.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.6B | $55.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.3B | $60.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 107.41x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 101.16x | 65.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 212.69x | 57.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.01x | 12.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.70x | 7.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 106.04x | 72.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VICR scores 7/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.6% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$390M | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $403M | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VICR five years ago would be worth $32,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,078 for MCHP. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +577.8% total return vs MCHP's +121.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 86.8% vs MCHP's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +139.9% | +59.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +577.8% | +121.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +552.1% | +45.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +226.0% | +50.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2947.2% | +375.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +86.8% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MCHP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCHP is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 95.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.79x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $293.95 | $103.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.64 | $46.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 79.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 871K | 8.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MCHP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VICR as "Buy" and MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -12.6% upside for VICR (target: $245) vs -15.5% for MCHP (target: $87). MCHP is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.00 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.2% |
VICR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MCHP leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
VICR vs MCHP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VICR or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the stronger pick with 13.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Vicor Corporation (VICR) offers the better valuation at 107. 4x trailing P/E (101. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vicor Corporation (VICR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VICR or MCHP?
On forward P/E, Microchip Technology Incorporated is actually cheaper at 65.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VICR or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, Vicor Corporation (VICR) delivered a total return of +226.
0%, compared to +50. 8% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +29. 5% versus MCHP's +375. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VICR or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
70β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 65% more volatile than MCHP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VICR or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vicor Corporation (VICR) is pulling ahead at 13.
5% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, VICR leads at 0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VICR or MCHP?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICR leads at 9. 0% versus 6. 7% for MCHP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCHP leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VICR or MCHP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) trades at 65.
7x forward P/E versus 101. 2x for Vicor Corporation — 35. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VICR: -12. 6% to $245. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VICR or MCHP?
In this comparison, MCHP (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. VICR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VICR or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
8% yield, +375. 9% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCHP: +375. 9%, VICR: +29. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VICR and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MCHP pays a dividend while VICR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.