Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VICR vs MCHP vs TXN vs ADI vs ON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
VICR vs MCHP vs TXN vs ADI vs ON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $11.79B | $54.97B | $259.70B | $199.44B | $39.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $4.37B | $18.44B | $11.76B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $-97M | $5.37B | $2.71B | $574M |
| Gross Margin | 57.3% | 51.6% | 57.3% | 62.8% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 4.1% | 35.3% | 29.2% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 94.3x | 64.8x | 37.8x | 35.8x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $5.67B | $15.39B | $8.66B | $3.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $403M | $772M | $3.23B | $2.50B | $2.15B |
VICR vs MCHP vs TXN vs ADI vs ON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 240.2 | +140.2% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 100 | 361.7 | +261.7% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VICR vs MCHP vs TXN vs ADI vs ON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VICR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs ON's 10.0%
- PEG 2.10 vs ADI's 5.25
- +5.4% vs TXN's +76.5%
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 94.6%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
ADI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 16.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
ON is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (34.4x vs 35.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.4x vs 35.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs TXN's +76.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8% |
VICR vs MCHP vs TXN vs ADI vs ON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VICR vs MCHP vs TXN vs ADI vs ON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADI leads in 1 of 6 categories
ON leads 1 • VICR leads 1 • TXN leads 1 • MCHP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 40.7x VICR's $453M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, ADI holds the edge at +30.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $4.4B | $18.4B | $11.8B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $881M | $8.1B | $5.4B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | -$97M | $5.4B | $2.7B | $574M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $820M | $3.7B | $4.6B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.3% | +51.6% | +57.3% | +62.8% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +4.1% | +35.3% | +29.2% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | -2.2% | +29.1% | +23.0% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +18.8% | +20.2% | +38.8% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +15.6% | +18.6% | +30.4% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +164.2% | +32.0% | +116.7% | +93.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ON leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.3x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 85% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICR offers better value at 2.23x vs ADI's 13.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $55.0B | $259.7B | $199.4B | $39.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.4B | $59.9B | $271.9B | $205.6B | $40.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 100.13x | -9999.00x | 52.34x | 89.59x | 346.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 94.31x | 64.79x | 37.76x | 35.77x | 34.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.23x | — | — | 13.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 197.81x | 57.21x | 33.89x | 41.69x | 28.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 28.91x | 12.49x | 14.69x | 18.10x | 6.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.50x | 7.71x | 16.00x | 6.00x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 98.86x | 71.19x | 99.77x | 46.61x | 27.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VICR and TXN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADI scores 8/9 vs ON's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | -1.4% | +32.5% | +8.0% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.6% | -0.7% | +15.5% | +5.6% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +1.8% | +15.8% | +5.4% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +2.1% | +19.0% | +6.5% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.80x | 0.95x | 0.26x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$390M | $4.9B | $12.2B | $6.2B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $403M | $772M | $3.2B | $2.5B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $5.7B | $15.4B | $8.7B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.78x | 12.06x | 10.80x | 10.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VICR five years ago would be worth $30,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,566 for MCHP. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs TXN's +76.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 82.5% vs ON's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +123.6% | +56.9% | +62.3% | +49.6% | +77.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +535.7% | +115.1% | +76.5% | +106.4% | +159.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +507.9% | +43.9% | +83.5% | +127.5% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.3% | +45.7% | +65.5% | +170.8% | +160.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2704.1% | +373.8% | +471.6% | +689.6% | +1004.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +82.5% | +12.9% | +22.4% | +31.5% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCHP and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.79x | 1.70x | 1.11x | 1.44x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $293.95 | $103.17 | $292.64 | $415.97 | $105.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.27 | $46.92 | $152.73 | $195.69 | $37.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +98.5% | +97.5% | +98.2% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 82.5 | 79.6 | 73.1 | 81.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 864K | 9.0M | 6.7M | 3.5M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VICR as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", ADI as "Buy", ON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -6.3% upside for VICR (target: $245) vs -38.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.92% vs ADI's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.00 | $87.00 | $253.71 | $374.42 | $62.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 46 | 65 | 54 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +1.9% | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.82 | $5.48 | $3.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.2% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +3.5% |
ADI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
VICR vs MCHP vs TXN vs ADI vs ON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Analog Devices, Inc.
(ADI) is the stronger pick with 16. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 52. 3x trailing P/E (37. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vicor Corporation (VICR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON?
On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 52.
3x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 34. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vicor Corporation wins at 2. 10x versus Analog Devices, Inc. 's 5. 25x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON?
Over the past 5 years, Vicor Corporation (VICR) delivered a total return of +201.
3%, compared to +45. 7% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus MCHP's +373. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 152% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Analog Devices, Inc.
(ADI) is pulling ahead at 16. 9% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, VICR leads at 0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 6. 7% for MCHP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADI leads at 61. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 10x versus Analog Devices, Inc. 's 5. 25x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 34. 4x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 59. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VICR: -6. 3% to $245. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), ADI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. VICR, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VICR or MCHP or TXN or ADI or ON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 9% yield, +471. 6% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +471. 6%, VICR: +27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VICR and MCHP and TXN and ADI and ON?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ADI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MCHP, TXN, ADI pay a dividend while VICR, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.