Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs TXN vs ADI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs TXN vs ADI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $11.79B | $77.41B | $4.00B | $259.70B | $199.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $2.79B | $446M | $18.44B | $11.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $616M | $17M | $5.37B | $2.71B |
| Gross Margin | 57.3% | 55.2% | 53.9% | 57.3% | 62.8% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 26.1% | 4.6% | 35.3% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 94.3x | 73.1x | 55.5x | 37.8x | 35.8x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $24M | $0.00 | $15.39B | $8.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $403M | $1.10B | $59M | $3.23B | $2.50B |
VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs TXN vs ADI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 240.2 | +140.2% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 100 | 361.7 | +261.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs TXN vs ADI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
- PEG 2.10 vs ADI's 5.25
- Better valuation composite
MPWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 26.4% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
POWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TXN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 94.6%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- 29.1% margin vs POWI's 3.7%
Among these 5 stocks, ADI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs POWI's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs POWI's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs POWI's 2.1%, ROIC 8.9% vs 2.4% |
VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs TXN vs ADI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs TXN vs ADI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADI leads in 1 of 6 categories
MPWR leads 1 • VICR leads 1 • TXN leads 1 • POWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 41.3x POWI's $446M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWI's 3.7%. On growth, ADI holds the edge at +30.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $2.8B | $446M | $18.4B | $11.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $781M | $41M | $8.1B | $5.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | $616M | $17M | $5.4B | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $664M | $85M | $3.7B | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.3% | +55.2% | +53.9% | +57.3% | +62.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +26.1% | +4.6% | +35.3% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +22.1% | +3.7% | +29.1% | +23.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +23.8% | +18.9% | +20.2% | +38.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +20.8% | +2.6% | +18.6% | +30.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -88.4% | -60.0% | +32.0% | +116.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — POWI and TXN and ADI each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.3x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 72% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICR offers better value at 2.23x vs ADI's 13.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $77.4B | $4.0B | $259.7B | $199.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.4B | $76.3B | $3.9B | $271.9B | $205.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 100.13x | 123.60x | 184.18x | 52.34x | 89.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 94.31x | 73.12x | 55.51x | 37.76x | 35.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.23x | 4.19x | — | — | 13.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 197.81x | 97.90x | 79.69x | 33.89x | 41.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 28.91x | 27.74x | 9.02x | 14.69x | 18.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.50x | 21.56x | 6.01x | 16.00x | 6.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 98.86x | 116.20x | 45.93x | 99.77x | 46.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $2 for POWI. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADI scores 8/9 vs POWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +17.9% | +2.4% | +32.5% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.6% | +15.2% | +2.1% | +15.5% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +22.2% | +2.4% | +15.8% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +20.4% | +2.9% | +19.0% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.01x | — | 0.95x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$390M | -$1.1B | -$59M | $12.2B | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $403M | $1.1B | $59M | $3.2B | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $24M | $0 | $15.4B | $8.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 12.06x | 10.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs POWI's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 82.5% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +123.6% | +68.5% | +93.2% | +62.3% | +49.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +535.7% | +148.6% | +44.4% | +76.5% | +106.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +507.9% | +280.3% | -6.3% | +83.5% | +127.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.3% | +366.2% | -8.3% | +65.5% | +170.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2704.1% | +2494.7% | +232.7% | +471.6% | +689.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +82.5% | +56.1% | -2.2% | +22.4% | +31.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXN and ADI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADI currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.79x | 2.28x | 2.08x | 1.11x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $293.95 | $1662.00 | $78.94 | $292.64 | $415.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.27 | $613.00 | $30.86 | $152.73 | $195.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +94.8% | +91.0% | +97.5% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 71.0 | 76.1 | 79.6 | 73.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 864K | 577K | 967K | 6.7M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VICR as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", ADI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -11.1% for TXN (target: $254). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.92% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.00 | $1615.00 | $79.00 | $253.71 | $374.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 25 | 16 | 65 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.2% | +1.9% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 18 | 22 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.90 | $0.84 | $5.48 | $3.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.0% | +2.5% | +0.6% | +1.1% |
ADI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MPWR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs TXN vs ADI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 52. 3x trailing P/E (37. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vicor Corporation (VICR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI?
On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 52.
3x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Analog Devices, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vicor Corporation wins at 2. 10x versus Analog Devices, Inc. 's 5. 25x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus POWI's +232. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 152% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus 5. 0% for Power Integrations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 4. 8% for POWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADI leads at 61. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 10x versus Analog Devices, Inc. 's 5. 25x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) trades at 35. 8x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 58. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield), ADI (0. 9% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. VICR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VICR or MPWR or POWI or TXN or ADI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 9% yield, +471. 6% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +471. 6%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VICR and MPWR and POWI and TXN and ADI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ADI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. POWI, TXN, ADI pay a dividend while VICR, MPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.