Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VIPS vs SE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VIPS
Vipshop Holdings Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$7.94B
5Y Perf.-15.1%
SE
Sea Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • SG
Market Cap$54.44B
5Y Perf.+12.8%

VIPS vs SE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VIPS logoVIPS
SE logoSE
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$7.94B$54.44B
Revenue (TTM)$105.97B$21.04B
Net Income (TTM)$6.92B$1.43B
Gross Margin23.3%44.9%
Operating Margin7.7%8.2%
Forward P/E0.8x25.4x
Total Debt$3.25B$4.12B
Cash & Equiv.$26.35B$2.41B

VIPS vs SELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VIPS
SE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Vipshop Holdings Li… (VIPS)10084.9-15.1%
Sea Limited (SE)100112.8+12.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VIPS vs SE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: VIPS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sea Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VIPS
Vipshop Holdings Limited
The Income Pick

VIPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 7.8%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.95, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.26x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SE
Sea Limited
The Growth Play

SE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 192.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
  • 463.8% 10Y total return vs VIPS's 29.0%
  • 28.8% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSE logoSE28.8% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9%
ValueVIPS logoVIPSLower P/E (0.8x vs 25.4x)
Quality / MarginsSE logoSE6.8% margin vs VIPS's 6.5%
Stability / SafetyVIPS logoVIPSBeta 0.95 vs SE's 1.45, lower leverage
DividendsVIPS logoVIPS3.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)VIPS logoVIPS+5.7% vs SE's -36.8%
Efficiency (ROA)VIPS logoVIPS9.4% ROA vs SE's 5.8%, ROIC 40.5% vs 5.4%

VIPS vs SE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VIPSVipshop Holdings Limited
FY 2024
Product
48.2%$100.7B
Womenswear And Menswear
16.7%$34.8B
Skincare And Cosmetics
6.7%$14.0B
Sportswear And Sporting Goods
6.6%$13.7B
Supermarkets And Other Products
5.9%$12.3B
Baby And Children Products
4.3%$9.0B
Home Goods And Other Lifestyle Products
4.1%$8.6B
Other (2)
7.6%$16.0B
SESea Limited
FY 2024
Service
90.7%$15.3B
Product
9.3%$1.6B

VIPS vs SE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLVIPSLAGGINGSE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

VIPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $106.0B annually — 5.0x SE's $21.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.8% (SE) to 6.5% (VIPS). On growth, SE holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVIPS logoVIPSVipshop Holdings …SE logoSESea Limited
RevenueTrailing 12 months$106.0B$21.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9.5B$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6.9B$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$3.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.3%+44.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.7%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.5%+6.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+18.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.0%+38.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.6%+126.9%
SE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

VIPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.0x trailing earnings, VIPS trades at a 94% valuation discount to SE's 123.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VIPS's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SE's 53.4x.

MetricVIPS logoVIPSVipshop Holdings …SE logoSESea Limited
Market CapShares × price$7.9B$54.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.6B$56.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.00x123.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.82x25.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.93x53.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.50x3.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.30x6.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.73x18.42x
VIPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

VIPS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

VIPS delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $15 for SE. VIPS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs VIPS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVIPS logoVIPSVipshop Holdings …SE logoSESea Limited
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.8%+15.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.4%+5.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+40.5%+5.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.2%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.49x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$23.1B$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$26.4B$2.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.3B$4.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense121.89x49.70x
VIPS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

VIPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VIPS five years ago would be worth $5,619 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,778 for SE. Over the past 12 months, VIPS leads with a +5.7% total return vs SE's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIPS at 2.7% vs SE's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVIPS logoVIPSVipshop Holdings …SE logoSESea Limited
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.3%-31.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+5.7%-36.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+8.3%+6.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.8%-62.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+29.0%+463.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.7%+2.2%
VIPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

VIPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

VIPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SE's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VIPS currently trades 69.9% from its 52-week high vs SE's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVIPS logoVIPSVipshop Holdings …SE logoSESea Limited
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.95x1.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.08$199.30
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.36$77.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.9%+45.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.645.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M4.8M
VIPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates VIPS as "Buy" and SE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.0% upside for SE (target: $148) vs 48.0% for VIPS (target: $22). VIPS is the only dividend payer here at 3.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVIPS logoVIPSVipshop Holdings …SE logoSESea Limited
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.80$147.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts2844
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

VIPS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).

Best OverallVipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VIPS vs SE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VIPS or SE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sea Limited (SE) is the stronger pick with 28.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VIPS or SE?

On trailing P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the cheapest at 7.

0x versus Sea Limited at 123. 3x. On forward P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VIPS or SE?

Over the past 5 years, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) delivered a total return of -43.

8%, compared to -62. 2% for Sea Limited (SE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SE returned +463. 8% versus VIPS's +29. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VIPS or SE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

95β versus Sea Limited's 1. 45β — meaning SE is approximately 52% more volatile than VIPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 49% for Sea Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VIPS or SE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sea Limited (SE) is pulling ahead at 28.

8% versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to -0. 5% for Vipshop Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VIPS or SE?

Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

1% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sea Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIPS leads at 8. 5% versus 3. 9% for SE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SE leads at 42. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VIPS or SE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) trades at 0.

8x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Sea Limited — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 64. 0% to $147. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VIPS or SE?

In this comparison, VIPS (3.

1% yield) pays a dividend. SE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is VIPS or SE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

95), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIPS: +29. 0%, SE: +463. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VIPS and SE?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VIPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. VIPS pays a dividend while SE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

VIPS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VIPS and SE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VIPS: -4.0% · SE: 38.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(VIPS: 6.5% · SE: 6.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(VIPS: 7.0x · SE: 123.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.