Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VIPS vs SE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
VIPS vs SE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $7.94B | $54.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $105.97B | $21.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.92B | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 44.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 25.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.25B | $4.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26.35B | $2.41B |
VIPS vs SE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vipshop Holdings Li… (VIPS) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 112.8 | +12.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIPS vs SE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VIPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 7.8%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.26x
SE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 192.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 463.8% 10Y total return vs VIPS's 29.0%
- 28.8% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 25.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs VIPS's 6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs SE's 1.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.7% vs SE's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs SE's 5.8%, ROIC 40.5% vs 5.4% |
VIPS vs SE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VIPS vs SE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $106.0B annually — 5.0x SE's $21.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.8% (SE) to 6.5% (VIPS). On growth, SE holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106.0B | $21.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.5B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.9B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +44.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +18.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +38.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.6% | +126.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VIPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, VIPS trades at a 94% valuation discount to SE's 123.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VIPS's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SE's 53.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.9B | $54.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $56.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.00x | 123.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.82x | 25.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.93x | 53.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 3.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 6.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.73x | 18.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VIPS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VIPS delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $15 for SE. VIPS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs VIPS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.8% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.5% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23.1B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26.4B | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.3B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 121.89x | 49.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VIPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIPS five years ago would be worth $5,619 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,778 for SE. Over the past 12 months, VIPS leads with a +5.7% total return vs SE's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIPS at 2.7% vs SE's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.3% | -31.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.7% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | +6.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.8% | -62.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.0% | +463.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | +2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
VIPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SE's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VIPS currently trades 69.9% from its 52-week high vs SE's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.08 | $199.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.36 | $77.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +45.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.6 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VIPS as "Buy" and SE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.0% upside for SE (target: $148) vs 48.0% for VIPS (target: $22). VIPS is the only dividend payer here at 3.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.80 | $147.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | 0.0% |
VIPS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
VIPS vs SE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIPS or SE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sea Limited (SE) is the stronger pick with 28.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIPS or SE?
On trailing P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus Sea Limited at 123. 3x. On forward P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIPS or SE?
Over the past 5 years, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) delivered a total return of -43.
8%, compared to -62. 2% for Sea Limited (SE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SE returned +463. 8% versus VIPS's +29. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIPS or SE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
95β versus Sea Limited's 1. 45β — meaning SE is approximately 52% more volatile than VIPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 49% for Sea Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIPS or SE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sea Limited (SE) is pulling ahead at 28.
8% versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to -0. 5% for Vipshop Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIPS or SE?
Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sea Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIPS leads at 8. 5% versus 3. 9% for SE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SE leads at 42. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIPS or SE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) trades at 0.
8x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Sea Limited — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 64. 0% to $147. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIPS or SE?
In this comparison, VIPS (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VIPS or SE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
95), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIPS: +29. 0%, SE: +463. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIPS and SE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VIPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. VIPS pays a dividend while SE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.