VIRC
Virco Mfg. Corporation
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$96M
5Y Perf.+160.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VIRC vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$294M
5Y Perf.+453.8%
VIRC vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VIRC | FLXS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $96M | $294M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $237M | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 42.6% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $40M |
VIRC vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VIRC
FLXS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virco Mfg. Corporat… (VIRC) | 100 | 260.5 | +160.5% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 553.8 | +453.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIRC vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VIRC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VIRC
Virco Mfg. Corporation
The Income Pick
VIRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 1.5%
- 72.0% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 50.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 38.3%, current ratio 2.98x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs VIRC's -1.1%
- +79.7% vs VIRC's -26.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FLXS | 6.9% revenue growth vs VIRC's -1.1% |
| Value | VIRC | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | VIRC | 5.7% margin vs FLXS's 4.8% |
| Stability / Safety | VIRC | Beta 0.86 vs FLXS's 1.51 |
| Dividends | VIRC | 1.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLXS | +79.7% vs VIRC's -26.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FLXS | 7.5% ROA vs VIRC's 6.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs 18.8% |
VIRC vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2023
VIRC vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLVIRCLAGGINGFLXS
FLXSFlexsteel Industries,…
2leads
VIRCVirco Mfg. Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FLXSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
VIRC6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FLXS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FLXS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
VIRC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VIRC and FLXS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS is the larger business by revenue, generating $458M annually — 1.9x VIRC's $237M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (VIRC) to 4.8% (FLXS). On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VIRCVirco Mfg. Corpor… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $237M | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.6% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.5% | -27.2% |
Evenly matched — VIRC and FLXS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
VIRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, VIRC trades at a 70% valuation discount to FLXS's 15.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VIRC's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLXS's 10.4x.
| Metric | VIRCVirco Mfg. Corpor… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96M | $294M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $111M | $313M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.60x | 15.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.55x | 11.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.30x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.57x | 8.72x |
VIRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $12 for VIRC. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIRC's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs VIRC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | VIRCVirco Mfg. Corpor… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.0% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.34x | 380.21x |
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIRC five years ago would be worth $19,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,230 for FLXS. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +79.7% total return vs VIRC's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.6% vs VIRC's 19.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VIRCVirco Mfg. Corpor… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.3% | +38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.4% | +79.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.5% | +241.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.0% | +22.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.0% | +50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +50.6% |
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIRC and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs VIRC's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VIRCVirco Mfg. Corpor… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.36 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.16 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 47K |
Evenly matched — VIRC and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
VIRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, VIRC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.47% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | VIRCVirco Mfg. Corpor… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +1.0% |
VIRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
VIRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). FLXS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallVirco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VIRC vs FLXS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIRC or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC). Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIRC or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. at 15. 5x. On forward P/E, Virco Mfg. Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIRC or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) delivered a total return of +97. 0%, compared to +22. 3% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIRC returned +72. 0% versus FLXS's +50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIRC or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately 76% more volatile than VIRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 38% for Virco Mfg. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIRC or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -1. 1% for Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Virco Mfg. Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIRC leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIRC or FLXS?
Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus 4. 6% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIRC leads at 10. 5% versus 6. 0% for FLXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIRC leads at 43. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIRC or FLXS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIRC or FLXS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 1. 1% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS).
09Is VIRC or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 5% yield). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIRC: +72. 0%, FLXS: +50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIRC and FLXS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(VIRC: -15.1% · FLXS: 9.8%)Net Margin>
%
(VIRC: 5.7% · FLXS: 4.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(VIRC: 4.6x · FLXS: 15.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.