Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VIRT vs IBKR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.32B
5Y Perf.+112.1%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.

Investment - Banking & Investment Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$37.39B
5Y Perf.+692.4%

VIRT vs IBKR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VIRT logoVIRT
IBKR logoIBKR
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsInvestment - Banking & Investment Services
Market Cap$4.32B$37.39B
Revenue (TTM)$3.63B$10.23B
Net Income (TTM)$551M$984M
Gross Margin48.0%89.8%
Operating Margin33.8%86.0%
Forward P/E8.4x33.7x
Total Debt$8.98B$19M
Cash & Equiv.$1.06B$4.96B

VIRT vs IBKRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VIRT
IBKR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Virtu Financial, In… (VIRT)100212.1+112.1%
Interactive Brokers… (IBKR)100792.4+692.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VIRT vs IBKR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: VIRT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

VIRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 2.0%
  • Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 72.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 1.69x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

IBKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 8.3% 10Y total return vs VIRT's 221.2%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs VIRT's 0.1% (lower = leaner)
  • +87.6% vs VIRT's +22.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVIRT logoVIRT26.2% NII/revenue growth vs IBKR's 9.8%
ValueVIRT logoVIRTLower P/E (8.4x vs 33.7x)
Quality / MarginsIBKR logoIBKREfficiency ratio 0.0% vs VIRT's 0.1% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyVIRT logoVIRTBeta 0.40 vs IBKR's 1.93
DividendsVIRT logoVIRT2.0% yield, vs IBKR's 0.4%
Momentum (1Y)IBKR logoIBKR+87.6% vs VIRT's +22.9%
Efficiency (ROA)IBKR logoIBKREfficiency ratio 0.0% vs VIRT's 0.1%

VIRT vs IBKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Sources
83.0%$3.0B
Commissions, Net
13.2%$480M
Workflow Technology
2.7%$99M
Analytics
1.0%$37M
IBKRInteractive Brokers Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Commissions
89.4%$2.1B
Risk Exposure Fees
3.3%$80M
Market Data Fees
3.3%$79M
Payments For Order Flow
2.1%$51M
Others
1.8%$44M

VIRT vs IBKR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBKRLAGGINGVIRT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IBKR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

IBKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 2.8x VIRT's $3.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.9% (VIRT) to 9.6% (IBKR).

MetricVIRT logoVIRTVirtu Financial, …IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.6B$10.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.9B$8.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$551M$984M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.1B$15.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.0%+89.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.8%+86.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.9%+9.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.7%+153.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+96.3%+26.0%
IBKR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — VIRT and IBKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, VIRT trades at a 74% valuation discount to IBKR's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IBKR's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VIRT's 9.1x.

MetricVIRT logoVIRTVirtu Financial, …IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
Market CapShares × price$4.3B$37.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.2B$32.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.86x37.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.44x33.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.13x3.65x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.19x3.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.19x1.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.33x2.38x
Evenly matched — VIRT and IBKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBKR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

VIRT delivers a 29.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $5 for IBKR. IBKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIRT's 4.55x.

MetricVIRT logoVIRTVirtu Financial, …IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.4%+5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.6%+0.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.1%+24.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.7%+22.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.55x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7.9B-$4.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.1B$5.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9.0B$19M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.71x2.13x
IBKR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBKR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IBKR five years ago would be worth $48,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,898 for VIRT. Over the past 12 months, IBKR leads with a +87.6% total return vs VIRT's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBKR at 64.1% vs VIRT's 44.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVIRT logoVIRTVirtu Financial, …IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+55.9%+24.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+22.9%+87.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+203.5%+341.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+99.0%+384.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+221.2%+828.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+44.8%+64.1%
IBKR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — VIRT and IBKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

VIRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IBKR's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricVIRT logoVIRTVirtu Financial, …IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.40x1.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$52.21$84.63
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$31.55$43.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.9%+99.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.566.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M4.5M
Evenly matched — VIRT and IBKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — VIRT and IBKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates VIRT as "Hold" and IBKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.5% upside for IBKR (target: $88) vs -5.1% for VIRT (target: $48). For income investors, VIRT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs IBKR's 0.36%.

MetricVIRT logoVIRTVirtu Financial, …IBKR logoIBKRInteractive Broke…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.00$87.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts1319
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.03$0.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.3%+0.2%
Evenly matched — VIRT and IBKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBKR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallInteractive Brokers Group, … (IBKR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VIRT vs IBKR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VIRT or IBKR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Virtu Financial, Inc.

(VIRT) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VIRT or IBKR?

On trailing P/E, Virtu Financial, Inc.

(VIRT) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Virtu Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VIRT or IBKR?

Over the past 5 years, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.

(IBKR) delivered a total return of +384. 2%, compared to +99. 0% for Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBKR returned +828. 0% versus VIRT's +221. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VIRT or IBKR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virtu Financial, Inc.

(VIRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning IBKR is approximately 379% more volatile than VIRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Virtu Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VIRT or IBKR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Virtu Financial, Inc.

(VIRT) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virtu Financial, Inc. grew EPS 72. 7% year-over-year, compared to 28. 3% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VIRT or IBKR?

Virtu Financial, Inc.

(VIRT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 9. 6% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus 33. 8% for VIRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBKR leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VIRT or IBKR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Virtu Financial, Inc.

(VIRT) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — 25. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBKR: 4. 5% to $87. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VIRT or IBKR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 4% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR).

09

Is VIRT or IBKR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Virtu Financial, Inc.

(VIRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 2. 0% yield, +221. 2% 10Y return). Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIRT: +221. 2%, IBKR: +828. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VIRT and IBKR?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VIRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VIRT pays a dividend while IBKR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

VIRT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBKR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VIRT and IBKR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VIRT: 26.2% · IBKR: 9.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(VIRT: 12.9% · IBKR: 9.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(VIRT: 9.9x · IBKR: 37.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.