VIVK
Vivakor, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$2K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VIVK vs CHNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-86.7%
VIVK vs CHNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VIVK | CHNR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $2K | $42M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-110M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -22.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | 63.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $35M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $265K | $3M |
VIVK vs CHNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VIVK
CHNR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vivakor, Inc. (VIVK) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIVK vs CHNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VIVK and CHNR are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. China Natural Resources, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VIVK
Vivakor, Inc.
The Income Pick
VIVK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth -109.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 54.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 94.7%, current ratio 0.13x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CHNR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -93.5% 10Y total return vs VIVK's -100.0%
- 0.0% margin vs VIVK's -105.6%
- +2.1% vs VIVK's -100.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VIVK | 16.3% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | CHNR | 0.0% margin vs VIVK's -105.6% |
| Stability / Safety | VIVK | Beta 0.68 vs CHNR's 1.10 |
| Dividends | VIVK | 100.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CHNR | +2.1% vs VIVK's -100.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHNR | -5.3% ROA vs VIVK's -57.5%, ROIC -0.0% vs -13.1% |
VIVK vs CHNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
VIVK vs CHNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHNRLAGGINGVIVK
VIVKVivakor, Inc.
1leads
CHNRChina Natural Resourc…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs VIVKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
VIVK1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHNR6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CHNR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIVK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIVK and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $104M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | VIVKVivakor, Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $104M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$110M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -105.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +91.3% |
VIVK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VIVK and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | VIVKVivakor, Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2,240 | $42M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $41M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -88.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 63.10x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 3.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — VIVK and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR delivers a -15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-143 for VIVK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VIVK scores 5/9 vs CHNR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | VIVKVivakor, Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -143.1% | -15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -57.5% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.1% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.9% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.95x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $265,019 | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.06x | -263.29x |
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHNR five years ago would be worth $736 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for VIVK. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a +2.1% total return vs VIVK's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHNR at -41.2% vs VIVK's -96.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VIVKVivakor, Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.5% | +22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | +2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -79.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -92.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -93.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.6% | -41.2% |
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIVK and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIVK is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHNR's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs VIVK's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VIVKVivakor, Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52000.00 | $8.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $3.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.2 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 893K |
Evenly matched — VIVK and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
VIVK is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | VIVKVivakor, Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2805.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CHNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VIVK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallChina Natural Resources, In… (CHNR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VIVK vs CHNR: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — VIVK or CHNR?
Over the past 5 years, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) delivered a total return of -92. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Vivakor, Inc. (VIVK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHNR returned -93. 5% versus VIVK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — VIVK or CHNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vivakor, Inc.
(VIVK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus China Natural Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CHNR is approximately 61% more volatile than VIVK relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — VIVK or CHNR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc.
grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to -109. 2% for Vivakor, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — VIVK or CHNR?
China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -105. 6% for Vivakor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHNR leads at 0. 0% versus -22. 3% for VIVK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIVK leads at 36. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — VIVK or CHNR?
In this comparison, VIVK (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CHNR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is VIVK or CHNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vivakor, Inc.
(VIVK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIVK: -100. 0%, CHNR: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between VIVK and CHNR?
These companies operate in different sectors (VIVK (Energy) and CHNR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VIVK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. VIVK pays a dividend while CHNR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.