Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VLRS vs UAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
VLRS vs UAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $898M | $32.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.04B | $60.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $3.67B |
| Gross Margin | 11.8% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.86B | $31.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $754M | $5.94B |
VLRS vs UAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controladora Vuela … (VLRS) | 100 | 156.3 | +56.3% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 355.6 | +255.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VLRS vs UAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VLRS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.64
- Lower volatility, beta 1.64, current ratio 0.73x
- Beta 1.64, current ratio 0.73x
UAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 8.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 118.1% 10Y total return vs VLRS's -61.6%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs VLRS's -3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs VLRS's -3.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.1% margin vs VLRS's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.64 vs UAL's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.5% vs UAL's +32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs VLRS's -1.8%, ROIC 9.1% vs 3.0% |
VLRS vs UAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VLRS vs UAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.5B annually — 19.9x VLRS's $3.0B. UAL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VLRS's -3.4%. On growth, UAL holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $60.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $642M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $388M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.0% | +84.5% |
Valuation Metrics
VLRS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VLRS's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UAL's 7.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $898M | $32.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $57.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.68x | 9.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.05x | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.41x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | 12.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-38 for VLRS. UAL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VLRS's 14.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UAL scores 8/9 vs VLRS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -38.0% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 14.66x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $25.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $754M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $31.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.50x | 4.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAL five years ago would be worth $18,217 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,444 for VLRS. Over the past 12 months, VLRS leads with a +91.5% total return vs UAL's +32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UAL at 29.5% vs VLRS's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.5% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +91.5% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +117.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | +82.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.6% | +118.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.3% | +29.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VLRS and UAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VLRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAL's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UAL currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs VLRS's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.80 | $119.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.90 | $71.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.3% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 758K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VLRS as "Buy" and UAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.3% upside for VLRS (target: $11) vs 36.5% for UAL (target: $136).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.43 | $136.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
UAL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VLRS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VLRS vs UAL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VLRS or UAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS). United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VLRS or UAL?
Over the past 5 years, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) delivered a total return of +82. 2%, compared to -55. 6% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAL returned +118. 1% versus VLRS's -61. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VLRS or UAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VLRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus United Airlines Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning UAL is approximately 38% more volatile than VLRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 15% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VLRS or UAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -3. 3% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Airlines Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 8. 1% year-over-year, compared to -181. 8% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UAL leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VLRS or UAL?
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -3. 4% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UAL leads at 8. 0% versus 4. 4% for VLRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UAL leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VLRS or UAL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VLRS: 46.
3% to $11. 43.
07Which pays a better dividend — VLRS or UAL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is VLRS or UAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VLRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VLRS: -61. 6%, UAL: +118. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VLRS and UAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.