Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VLTO vs ROP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
VLTO vs ROP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $21.64B | $35.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.59B | $8.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $969M | $1.71B |
| Gross Margin | 59.9% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.5x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.67B | $9.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.03B | $297M |
VLTO vs ROP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veralto Corporation (VLTO) | 100 | 102.7 | +2.7% |
| Roper Technologies,… (ROP) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VLTO vs ROP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VLTO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- -10.2% vs ROP's -39.7%
- 12.9% ROA vs ROP's 5.0%, ROIC 25.7% vs 6.1%
ROP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 109.8% 10Y total return vs VLTO's 9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% revenue growth vs VLTO's 6.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.1% margin vs VLTO's 17.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs VLTO's 0.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs VLTO's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.2% vs ROP's -39.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs ROP's 5.0%, ROIC 25.7% vs 6.1% |
VLTO vs ROP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VLTO vs ROP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP and VLTO operate at a comparable scale, with $8.1B and $5.6B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.1% (ROP) to 17.3% (VLTO). On growth, ROP holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.6B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $969M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +59.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ROP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, VLTO trades at a 4% valuation discount to ROP's 24.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROP's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VLTO's 16.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.6B | $35.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.3B | $44.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.10x | 24.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.48x | 15.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.44x | 14.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.93x | 4.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.00x | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.34x | 14.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VLTO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VLTO delivers a 33.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $9 for ROP. ROP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VLTO's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROP scores 6/9 vs VLTO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.4% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.7% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.7% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $642M | $9.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $297M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.96x | 6.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VLTO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VLTO five years ago would be worth $10,906 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,051 for ROP. Over the past 12 months, VLTO leads with a -10.2% total return vs ROP's -39.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VLTO at 2.9% vs ROP's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.7% | -20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.2% | -39.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | -19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | +109.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VLTO and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VLTO's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VLTO currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs ROP's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.11 | $584.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.99 | $313.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +58.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
ROP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VLTO as "Hold" and ROP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.3% upside for ROP (target: $458) vs 22.2% for VLTO (target: $106). For income investors, ROP offers the higher dividend yield at 0.96% vs VLTO's 0.50%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $106.14 | $457.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
ROP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VLTO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
VLTO vs ROP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VLTO or ROP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 0% for Veralto Corporation (VLTO). Veralto Corporation (VLTO) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VLTO or ROP?
On trailing P/E, Veralto Corporation (VLTO) is the cheapest at 23.
1x versus Roper Technologies, Inc. at 24. 2x. On forward P/E, Roper Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VLTO or ROP?
Over the past 5 years, Veralto Corporation (VLTO) delivered a total return of +9.
1%, compared to -19. 5% for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROP returned +109. 8% versus VLTO's +9. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VLTO or ROP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Veralto Corporation's 0. 61β — meaning VLTO is approximately 55% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 86% for Veralto Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VLTO or ROP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 6. 0% for Veralto Corporation (VLTO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veralto Corporation grew EPS 12. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1. 0% for Roper Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROP leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VLTO or ROP?
Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus 17. 1% for Veralto Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROP leads at 28. 3% versus 23. 2% for VLTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROP leads at 69. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VLTO or ROP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Veralto Corporation — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROP: 33. 3% to $457. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — VLTO or ROP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Veralto Corporation (VLTO).
09Is VLTO or ROP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 0% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROP: +109. 8%, VLTO: +9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VLTO and ROP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.