Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VMD vs ISRG vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
VMD vs ISRG vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $353M | $161.07B | $16.97B | $1.92B | $112.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $287M | $10.58B | $4.13B | $674M | $25.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $2.98B | $544M | $-173M | $3.25B |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 66.3% | 52.8% | 75.2% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 30.5% | 17.5% | -27.2% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 43.8x | 17.2x | — | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $303M | $2.63B | $290M | $14.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $3.37B | $1.96B | $103M | $4.01B |
VMD vs ISRG vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viemed Healthcare, … (VMD) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 234.6 | +134.6% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VMD vs ISRG vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 32.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.9%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
ISRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SYK's 187.1%
- 28.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
- 14.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -16.4%
HOLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SYK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
- PEG 1.32 vs ISRG's 2.01
- 1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs SYK's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -16.4% |
VMD vs ISRG vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VMD vs ISRG vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
VMD leads 1 • HOLX leads 1 • SYK leads 1 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 87.6x VMD's $287M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, VMD holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $287M | $10.6B | $4.1B | $674M | $25.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | $3.8B | $974M | -$165M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $3.0B | $544M | -$173M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $2.8B | $1000M | -$48M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +66.3% | +52.8% | +75.2% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +30.5% | +17.5% | -27.2% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +28.2% | +13.2% | -25.7% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +26.8% | +24.2% | -7.1% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.5% | +23.0% | +2.5% | +12.3% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +18.8% | -9.2% | -100.0% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VMD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.9x trailing earnings, VMD trades at a 57% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.36x vs ISRG's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $353M | $161.1B | $17.0B | $1.9B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $356M | $158.0B | $17.6B | $2.1B | $123.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.89x | 57.62x | 30.53x | -13.80x | 35.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.19x | 43.84x | 17.21x | — | 19.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.65x | — | — | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.21x | 43.62x | 17.39x | — | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.31x | 16.00x | 4.14x | 2.92x | 4.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.62x | 9.17x | 3.43x | 5.51x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.59x | 64.67x | 18.44x | — | 26.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs VMD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.5% | +16.9% | +11.0% | -50.8% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +14.8% | +6.1% | -16.5% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +15.0% | +9.4% | -16.4% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +16.5% | +8.8% | -28.9% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.02x | 0.52x | 0.85x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$3.1B | $667M | $187M | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $3.4B | $2.0B | $103M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $303M | $2.6B | $290M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.61x | — | 8.00x | -96.80x | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs SYK's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.4% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.6% | -19.3% | +1.9% | +28.3% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.7% | -15.4% | +37.1% | +1.1% | -22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.6% | +49.6% | -8.5% | -75.7% | +5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.8% | +58.7% | +15.8% | -91.3% | +21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +413.5% | +554.2% | +124.3% | +30.3% | +187.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.1% | +14.4% | -2.9% | -37.6% | +1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SYK's 72.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.02x | 0.41x | 2.20x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.18 | $603.88 | $76.04 | $20.06 | $404.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.93 | $427.84 | $52.81 | $9.82 | $289.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +75.1% | +100.0% | +83.9% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.7 | 42.4 | 69.1 | 69.8 | 24.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 312K | 1.8M | 10.0M | 1.5M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SYK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VMD as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $622.60 | $79.00 | $33.50 | $403.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 55 | 42 | 15 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +1.4% | +4.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
VMD vs ISRG vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Viemed Healthcare, Inc.
(VMD) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). Viemed Healthcare, Inc. (VMD) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viemed Healthcare, Inc. (VMD) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
On trailing P/E, Viemed Healthcare, Inc.
(VMD) is the cheapest at 24. 9x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Hologic, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 32x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus NVCR's +30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 437% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viemed Healthcare, Inc.
(VMD) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viemed Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 32. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VMD leads at 24. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 43. 8x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 26. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. VMD, ISRG, HOLX, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VMD or ISRG or HOLX or NVCR or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VMD and ISRG and HOLX and NVCR and SYK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK pays a dividend while VMD, ISRG, HOLX, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.