Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VNDA vs PCRX vs SUPN vs PRGO vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
VNDA vs PCRX vs SUPN vs PRGO vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $378M | $930M | $3.01B | $1.61B | $3.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $218M | $735M | $777M | $4.18B | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-240M | $9M | $-29M | $-1.82B | $376M |
| Gross Margin | 71.1% | 60.2% | 89.4% | 34.2% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -73.6% | 3.4% | -5.5% | -4.1% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.6x | 24.1x | 5.6x | 50.9x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $454M | $41M | $3.97B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $159M | $128M | $532M | $178M |
VNDA vs PCRX vs SUPN vs PRGO vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanda Pharmaceutica… (VNDA) | 100 | 54.5 | -45.5% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VNDA vs PCRX vs SUPN vs PRGO vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, VNDA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PCRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.47
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47 vs ACAD's 1.26
SUPN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 228.4% 10Y total return vs ACAD's -22.9%
- +69.0% vs PRGO's -51.2%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 50.9x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
- 34.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0%
- 26.2% ROA vs VNDA's -44.6%, ROIC 10.0% vs -32.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 50.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs ACAD's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.0% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs VNDA's -44.6%, ROIC 10.0% vs -32.2% |
VNDA vs PCRX vs SUPN vs PRGO vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VNDA vs PCRX vs SUPN vs PRGO vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 1 • SUPN leads 1 • VNDA leads 0 • PCRX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 19.2x VNDA's $218M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNDA's -110.0%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $218M | $735M | $777M | $4.2B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$150M | $95M | $29M | $58M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$240M | $9M | -$29M | -$1.8B | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$127M | $133M | $82M | $108M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.1% | +60.2% | +89.4% | +34.2% | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -73.6% | +3.4% | -5.5% | -4.1% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -110.0% | +1.3% | -3.7% | -43.5% | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -58.5% | +18.1% | +10.6% | +2.6% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +5.0% | +38.6% | -7.2% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.0% | -30.0% | +81.0% | -56.4% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 93% valuation discount to PCRX's 147.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $378M | $930M | $3.0B | $1.6B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $305M | $1.2B | $2.9B | $5.1B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.71x | 147.75x | -76.88x | -1.14x | 9.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.61x | 24.12x | 5.56x | 50.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.86x | 53.44x | 7.42x | 26.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 1.28x | 4.19x | 0.38x | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.54x | 2.78x | 0.55x | 3.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.80x | 65.45x | 11.12x | 36.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-61 for VNDA. VNDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs VNDA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.4% | +1.3% | -2.7% | -50.7% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.6% | +0.7% | -2.0% | -19.8% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.2% | +2.3% | -2.8% | +3.7% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.6% | +2.8% | -3.4% | +4.3% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.66x | 0.04x | 1.35x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$72M | $296M | -$87M | $3.4B | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $159M | $128M | $532M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $454M | $41M | $4.0B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.37x | — | -7.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SUPN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $17,801 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,578 for VNDA. Over the past 12 months, SUPN leads with a +69.0% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPN at 12.4% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.5% | -3.4% | +5.7% | -13.5% | -13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.9% | -6.1% | +69.0% | -51.2% | +52.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.8% | -44.1% | +42.1% | -58.1% | +4.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | -62.6% | +78.0% | -60.1% | +7.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.8% | -51.2% | +228.4% | -77.7% | -22.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.7% | -17.6% | +12.4% | -25.2% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCRX and SUPN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACAD's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUPN currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.47x | 0.78x | 1.18x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.94 | $27.64 | $59.68 | $28.44 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.81 | $18.80 | $29.16 | $9.23 | $14.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.3% | +85.5% | +87.6% | +41.2% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 45.9 | 57.9 | 60.9 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 695K | 604K | 3.4M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VNDA as "Buy", PCRX as "Hold", SUPN as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 121.8% upside for VNDA (target: $14) vs 14.8% for SUPN (target: $60). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.17 | $29.50 | $60.00 | $20.00 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 36 | 14 | 36 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +16.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VNDA vs PCRX vs SUPN vs PRGO vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VNDA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 147. 8x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +78. 0%, compared to -64. 2% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VNDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +228. 4% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning ACAD is approximately 168% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VNDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1068. 8% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -102. 0% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -70. 0% for VNDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNDA leads at 94. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 45. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNDA: 121. 8% to $14. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. VNDA, PCRX, SUPN, ACAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VNDA or PCRX or SUPN or PRGO or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCRX: -51. 2%, ACAD: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VNDA and PCRX and SUPN and PRGO and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VNDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. PRGO pays a dividend while VNDA, PCRX, SUPN, ACAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.