Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VOR vs BEAM vs KO vs EDIT vs CRSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
VOR vs BEAM vs KO vs EDIT vs CRSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $97M | $3.02B | $355.22B | $239M | $4.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $132M | $49.28B | $39M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-883M | $-65M | $13.70B | $-109M | $-569M |
| Gross Margin | — | -64.2% | 61.7% | 98.8% | -53.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -281.0% | 29.3% | -297.5% | -134.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $294M | $45.49B | $77M | $395M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $396M | $295M | $10.27B | $147M | $355M |
VOR vs BEAM vs KO vs EDIT vs CRSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 32.6 | -67.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.6 | +68.6% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 5.7 | -94.3% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VOR vs BEAM vs KO vs EDIT vs CRSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- beta 1.90
- Beta 1.90, current ratio 18.20x
- Beta 1.90 vs EDIT's 2.63
- +220.2% vs KO's +17.4%
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs VOR's -6.6%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 13.1% ROA vs VOR's -261.2%
EDIT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 256.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 120.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.95, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 13.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs VOR's -6.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.90 vs EDIT's 2.63 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.2% vs KO's +17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs VOR's -261.2% |
VOR vs BEAM vs KO vs EDIT vs CRSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VOR vs BEAM vs KO vs EDIT vs CRSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 5 of 6 categories
BEAM leads 1 • VOR leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • CRSP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and VOR operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $132M | $49.3B | $39M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$371M | -$355M | $15.5B | -$111M | -$531M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$883M | -$65M | $13.7B | -$109M | -$569M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$151M | -$384M | $12.6B | -$141M | -$401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -64.2% | +61.7% | +98.8% | -53.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.8% | +29.3% | -3.0% | -134.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -49.2% | +27.8% | -2.8% | -138.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.9% | +25.5% | -3.6% | -97.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | +12.1% | -39.2% | +68.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.2% | +26.6% | +18.2% | +71.7% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $3.0B | $355.2B | $239M | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$297M | $3.0B | $390.4B | $169M | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | -36.31x | 27.15x | -1.36x | -7.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.24x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.36x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 21.62x | 7.41x | 5.90x | 1380.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.35x | 10.39x | 7.94x | 2.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.07x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-7 for EDIT. CRSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 2.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -5.9% | +41.1% | -6.8% | -30.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -4.6% | +13.1% | -58.2% | -24.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -31.1% | +15.8% | — | -22.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -132.0% | -33.3% | +17.3% | -49.1% | -26.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.24x | 1.33x | 2.81x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$393M | -$1M | $35.2B | -$70M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $396M | $295M | $10.3B | $147M | $355M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $294M | $45.5B | $77M | $395M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.08x | 10.70x | -91.80x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $331 for VOR. Over the past 12 months, VOR leads with a +220.2% total return vs KO's +17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs VOR's -47.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.0% | +8.4% | +20.2% | +19.0% | -6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +220.2% | +64.4% | +17.4% | +20.2% | +21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | -10.8% | +46.9% | -75.4% | -16.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.7% | -66.9% | +63.6% | -93.5% | -60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | +56.9% | +120.9% | -91.9% | +256.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.7% | -3.7% | +13.7% | -37.4% | -5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs VOR's 21.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 2.18x | -0.20x | 2.52x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.80 | $36.44 | $84.04 | $4.54 | $78.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.63 | $15.60 | $65.35 | $1.66 | $39.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.4% | +80.7% | +98.2% | +53.7% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 48.7 | 65.7 | 39.8 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 922K | 1.9M | 12.6M | 2.1M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VOR as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.8% upside for VOR (target: $32) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.67 | $48.00 | $86.29 | $5.00 | $71.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 27 | 48 | 25 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 56 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BEAM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
VOR vs BEAM vs KO vs EDIT vs CRSP: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +63.
6%, compared to -96. 7% for Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +253. 4% versus VOR's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately -1361% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -107. 4% for Vor Biopharma Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDIT leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VOR: 124.
8% to $31. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. VOR, BEAM, EDIT, CRSP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is VOR or BEAM or KO or EDIT or CRSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, EDIT: -91. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VOR and BEAM and KO and EDIT and CRSP?
These companies operate in different sectors (VOR (Healthcare) and BEAM (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and EDIT (Healthcare) and CRSP (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; EDIT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while VOR, BEAM, EDIT, CRSP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.