Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VOR logo
VOR
CRSP logo
CRSP
KO logo
KO
BEAM logo
BEAM
EDIT logo
EDIT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VOR vs CRSP vs KO vs BEAM vs EDIT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VOR
Vor Biopharma Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.-60.4%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+68.6%
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.98B
5Y Perf.-67.4%
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$245M
5Y Perf.-94.3%

VOR vs CRSP vs KO vs BEAM vs EDIT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VOR logoVOR
CRSP logoCRSP
KO logoKO
BEAM logoBEAM
EDIT logoEDIT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$98M$4.80B$355.61B$2.98B$245M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$4M$49.28B$132M$39M
Net Income (TTM)$-883M$-569M$13.70B$-65M$-109M
Gross Margin-53.6%61.7%-64.2%98.8%
Operating Margin-134.1%29.3%-281.0%-297.5%
Forward P/E25.3x
Total Debt$3M$395M$45.49B$294M$77M
Cash & Equiv.$396M$355M$10.27B$295M$147M

VOR vs CRSP vs KO vs BEAM vs EDITLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VOR
CRSP
KO
BEAM
EDIT
StockFeb 21Jun 26Return
Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR)1001.6-98.4%
CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP)10039.6-60.4%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100168.6+68.6%
Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM)10032.6-67.4%
Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT)1005.7-94.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VOR vs CRSP vs KO vs BEAM vs EDIT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Vor Biopharma Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. CRSP and BEAM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VOR
Vor Biopharma Inc.
The Momentum Pick

VOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +246.9% vs EDIT's +14.7%
Best for: momentum
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG
The Income Pick

CRSP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.89
  • 253.4% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 13.32x
  • Beta 1.89, current ratio 13.32x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs VOR's -261.2%
Best for: quality and dividends
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Play

BEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
  • 120.0% revenue growth vs VOR's -6.6%
Best for: growth exposure
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EDIT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBEAM logoBEAM120.0% revenue growth vs VOR's -6.6%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
Stability / SafetyCRSP logoCRSPBeta 1.89 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)VOR logoVOR+246.9% vs EDIT's +14.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs VOR's -261.2%

VOR vs CRSP vs KO vs BEAM vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
VORVor Biopharma Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRSPCRISPR Therapeutics AG
FY 2025
Grant
100.0%$4M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
BEAMBeam Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

EDITEditas Medicine, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$41M

VOR vs CRSP vs KO vs BEAM vs EDIT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGEDIT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and VOR operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$4M$49.3B$132M$39M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$371M-$531M$15.5B-$355M-$111M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$883M-$569M$13.7B-$65M-$109M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$151M-$401M$12.6B-$384M-$141M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-53.6%+61.7%-64.2%+98.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-134.1%+29.3%-2.8%-3.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-138.6%+27.8%-49.2%-2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-97.8%+25.5%-2.9%-3.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+68.6%+12.1%-100.0%-39.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-97.2%+19.0%+18.2%+26.6%+71.7%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Market CapShares × price$98M$4.8B$355.6B$3.0B$245M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$295M$4.8B$390.8B$3.0B$175M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.20x-7.70x27.18x-35.84x-1.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1368.42x7.42x21.34x6.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.33x10.40x2.32x8.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x
BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-7 for EDIT. CRSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 2.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-30.9%+41.1%-5.9%-6.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%-24.5%+13.1%-4.6%-58.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-22.3%+15.8%-31.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-132.0%-26.6%+17.3%-33.3%-49.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–931741
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x1.33x0.24x2.81x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$393M$40M$35.2B-$1M-$70M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$396M$355M$10.3B$295M$147M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$395M$45.5B$294M$77M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.70x1.08x-91.80x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $322 for VOR. Over the past 12 months, VOR leads with a +246.9% total return vs EDIT's +14.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs VOR's -47.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.4%-7.4%+20.3%+7.0%+22.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+246.9%+20.6%+17.2%+66.5%+14.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.4%-16.9%+47.0%-12.0%-74.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.8%-61.3%+65.6%-68.4%-93.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%+253.4%+121.1%+54.8%-91.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-47.4%-6.0%+13.7%-4.2%-36.9%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs VOR's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.96x1.89x-0.20x2.18x2.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$65.80$78.48$84.04$36.44$4.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.63$39.81$65.35$15.60$1.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+21.8%+63.5%+98.3%+79.7%+55.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.245.660.648.439.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded903K1.7M12.7M1.9M2.1M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: VOR as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", KO as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 120.5% upside for VOR (target: $32) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.67$71.67$86.13$48.00$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1338482725
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises560
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BEAM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VOR vs CRSP vs KO vs BEAM vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -96. 8% for Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +253. 4% versus VOR's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately -1361% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -107. 4% for Vor Biopharma Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDIT leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VOR: 120.

5% to $31. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. VOR, CRSP, BEAM, EDIT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is VOR or CRSP or KO or BEAM or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, EDIT: -91. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between VOR and CRSP and KO and BEAM and EDIT?

These companies operate in different sectors (VOR (Healthcare) and CRSP (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and BEAM (Healthcare) and EDIT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap high-growth stock. KO pays a dividend while VOR, CRSP, BEAM, EDIT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.