Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VRDN vs IMVT vs RDVT vs RCUS vs KYMR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VRDN
Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.44B
5Y Perf.+22.2%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.-19.8%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$693M
5Y Perf.+136.1%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.+4.2%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.91B
5Y Perf.+165.3%

VRDN vs IMVT vs RDVT vs RCUS vs KYMR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VRDN logoVRDN
IMVT logoIMVT
RDVT logoRDVT
RCUS logoRCUS
KYMR logoKYMR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologySoftware - ApplicationBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$1.44B$5.53B$693M$2.50B$6.91B
Revenue (TTM)$71M$0.00$94M$236M$51M
Net Income (TTM)$-361M$-464M$14M$-369M$-315M
Gross Margin99.4%84.2%90.7%33.2%
Operating Margin-5.4%15.3%-168.6%-7.0%
Forward P/E36.5x
Total Debt$51M$98K$3M$99M$82M
Cash & Equiv.$212M$714M$44M$222M$357M

VRDN vs IMVT vs RDVT vs RCUS vs KYMRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VRDN
IMVT
RDVT
RCUS
KYMR
StockAug 20May 26Return
Viridian Therapeuti… (VRDN)100122.2+22.2%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10080.2-19.8%
Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT)100236.1+136.1%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100104.2+4.2%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100265.3+165.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VRDN vs IMVT vs RDVT vs RCUS vs KYMR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RDVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. RCUS and KYMR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VRDN
Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

VRDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24
  • Rev growth 233.6%, EPS growth 16.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 241.9%
  • 233.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 173.6% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 154.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

RDVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 15.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
  • 0.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 12.8% ROA vs VRDN's -50.6%, ROIC 17.6% vs -47.3%
Best for: quality and dividends
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +209.6% vs RDVT's +21.3%
Best for: momentum
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 1.15 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVRDN logoVRDN233.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
Quality / MarginsRDVT logoRDVT15.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyKYMR logoKYMRBeta 1.15 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage
DividendsRDVT logoRDVT0.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+209.6% vs RDVT's +21.3%
Efficiency (ROA)RDVT logoRDVT12.8% ROA vs VRDN's -50.6%, ROIC 17.6% vs -47.3%

VRDN vs IMVT vs RDVT vs RCUS vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VRDNViridian Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
License
98.8%$70M
Collaboration
1.2%$849,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RDVTRed Violet, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

VRDN vs IMVT vs RDVT vs RCUS vs KYMR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRDVTLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RDVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

RCUS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. RDVT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, VRDN holds the edge at +95.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVRDN logoVRDNViridian Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RDVT logoRDVTRed Violet, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$71M$0$94M$236M$51M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$386M-$487M$23M-$391M-$352M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$361M-$464M$14M-$369M-$315M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$304M-$423M$28M-$489M-$244M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.4%+84.2%+90.7%+33.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.4%+15.3%-168.6%-7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.1%+15.0%-156.4%-6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.3%+29.4%-2.1%-4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+95.8%+17.4%-39.3%+55.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.4%+19.7%+25.0%+10.5%+13.4%
RDVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — VRDN and RDVT and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricVRDN logoVRDNViridian Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RDVT logoRDVTRed Violet, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$5.5B$693M$2.5B$6.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$4.8B$652M$2.4B$6.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.11x-9.97x53.95x-7.54x-22.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.36.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue20.32x7.68x10.11x176.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.99x5.83x7.00x4.22x4.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.07x
Evenly matched — VRDN and RDVT and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RDVT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

RDVT delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDVT scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVRDN logoVRDNViridian Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RDVT logoRDVTRed Violet, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.7%-47.1%+14.0%-69.0%-25.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-50.6%-44.1%+12.8%-35.3%-22.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-47.3%+17.6%-64.1%-24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-47.7%-66.1%+13.7%-42.1%-27.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932704
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.00x0.03x0.16x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$162M-$714M-$41M-$123M-$275M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$212M$714M$44M$222M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$51M$98,000$3M$99M$82M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-32.68x-13.38x-2119.53x
RDVT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KYMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RDVT five years ago would be worth $25,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,143 for RCUS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs RDVT's +21.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.0% vs VRDN's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVRDN logoVRDNViridian Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RDVT logoRDVTRed Violet, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-44.7%+5.1%-4.4%+6.5%+16.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+38.1%+96.1%+21.3%+209.6%+190.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.4%+40.9%+199.9%+24.9%+205.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.2%+62.4%+155.9%-18.6%+92.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%+173.6%+6.4%+45.9%+154.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.7%+12.1%+44.2%+7.7%+45.0%
KYMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs VRDN's 49.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVRDN logoVRDNViridian Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RDVT logoRDVTRed Violet, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x1.37x1.17x1.95x1.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$34.29$30.09$64.14$28.72$103.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.76$13.36$33.62$7.06$28.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+49.5%+90.5%+76.5%+86.3%+82.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.260.264.860.554.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M1.4M118K1.2M602K
Evenly matched — IMVT and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: VRDN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RDVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 151.4% upside for VRDN (target: $43) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30). RDVT is the only dividend payer here at 0.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVRDN logoVRDNViridian Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RDVT logoRDVTRed Violet, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$42.67$45.50$62.00$30.00$117.06
# AnalystsCovering analysts162311826
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

RDVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallRed Violet, Inc. (RDVT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VRDN vs IMVT vs RDVT vs RCUS vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.

(VRDN) is the stronger pick with 233. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) offers the better valuation at 53. 9x trailing P/E (36. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. (VRDN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR?

Over the past 5 years, Red Violet, Inc.

(RDVT) delivered a total return of +155. 9%, compared to -18. 6% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus VRDN's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 70% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.

(VRDN) is pulling ahead at 233. 6% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Violet, Inc. grew EPS 82. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRDN leads at 241. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR?

Red Violet, Inc.

(RDVT) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RDVT leads at 14. 6% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRDN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRDN: 151.

4% to $42. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR?

In this comparison, RDVT (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. VRDN, IMVT, RCUS, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is VRDN or IMVT or RDVT or RCUS or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Red Violet, Inc.

(RDVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 0. 6% yield). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RDVT: +6. 4%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between VRDN and IMVT and RDVT and RCUS and KYMR?

These companies operate in different sectors (VRDN (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and RDVT (Technology) and RCUS (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VRDN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RDVT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RDVT pays a dividend while VRDN, IMVT, RCUS, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

VRDN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 47%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RDVT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KYMR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.