REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VRE vs CBRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
VRE vs CBRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $42.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $291M | $42.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.37B | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $1.86B |
VRE vs CBRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veris Residential, … (VRE) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
| CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) | 100 | 330.1 | +230.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRE vs CBRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, current ratio 0.08x
- Beta 0.22, yield 1.7%, current ratio 0.08x
CBRE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 394.8% 10Y total return vs VRE's -12.8%
- 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs VRE's 6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs VRE's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.0x vs 23.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.2% margin vs CBRE's 3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs CBRE's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.7% vs CBRE's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs VRE's 2.5%, ROIC 6.2% vs 1.3% |
VRE vs CBRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VRE vs CBRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VRE and CBRE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.2B annually — 145.0x VRE's $291M. VRE is the more profitable business, keeping 24.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBRE's 3.1%. On growth, CBRE holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $291M | $42.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $129M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $897M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +35.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +18.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +98.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VRE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.7x trailing earnings, VRE trades at a 37% valuation discount to CBRE's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VRE's 23.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CBRE's 24.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $42.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $50.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.69x | 37.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.08x | 24.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.17x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 4.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.35x | 35.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRE delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for VRE. CBRE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRE's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRE scores 7/9 vs CBRE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 8.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBRE five years ago would be worth $17,014 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,436 for VRE. Over the past 12 months, VRE leads with a +21.7% total return vs CBRE's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBRE at 25.7% vs VRE's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.2% | -9.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.7% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +98.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.4% | +70.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | +394.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +25.7% |
Risk & Volatility
VRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRE's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRE currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CBRE's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.03 | $174.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.69 | $118.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
VRE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VRE as "Hold" and CBRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.8% upside for CBRE (target: $180) vs -26.1% for VRE (target: $14). VRE is the only dividend payer here at 1.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $179.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.3% |
VRE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CBRE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
VRE vs CBRE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRE or CBRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VRE or CBRE?
On trailing P/E, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus CBRE Group, Inc. at 37. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VRE or CBRE?
Over the past 5 years, CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) delivered a total return of +70. 1%, compared to +14. 4% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +394. 8% versus VRE's -12. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VRE or CBRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning CBRE is approximately 408% more volatile than VRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 107% for Veris Residential, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VRE or CBRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 6. 4% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veris Residential, Inc. grew EPS 420. 0% year-over-year, compared to 22. 6% for CBRE Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBRE leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VRE or CBRE?
Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 2. 9% for CBRE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRE leads at 17. 1% versus 3. 2% for CBRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBRE leads at 15. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VRE or CBRE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBRE: 23.
8% to $179. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — VRE or CBRE?
In this comparison, VRE (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CBRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VRE or CBRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRE: -12. 8%, CBRE: +394. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VRE and CBRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
VRE pays a dividend while CBRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.