Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VRPX vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
VRPX vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $425.00 | $1636.12T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-168M |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $194M |
VRPX vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virpax Pharmaceutic… (VRPX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRPX vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VRPX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 20.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth -347.5%
- -88.6% 10Y total return vs VRPX's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs VRPX's -6.7% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.8% vs VRPX's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -89.0% ROA vs VRPX's -6.4% |
VRPX vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRPX and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.4% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $425 | $1636.12T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $1636.12T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -0.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT delivers a -130.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-130 in annual profit, vs $-24 for VRPX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs VRPX's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.6% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.7% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -116.10x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DBVT five years ago would be worth $3,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for VRPX. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +116.8% total return vs VRPX's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 1.1% vs VRPX's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.1% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | +116.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -66.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -88.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -99.0% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRPX and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRPX is the less volatile stock with a -0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DBVT currently trades 72.9% from its 52-week high vs VRPX's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.47x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.48 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +72.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 359 | 231K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DBVT leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
VRPX vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRPX or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VRPX or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) delivered a total return of -66. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Virpax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (VRPX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DBVT returned -88. 6% versus VRPX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VRPX or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virpax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(VRPX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 47β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 11β — meaning DBVT is approximately -337% more volatile than VRPX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — VRPX or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DBV Technologies S.
A. grew EPS -347. 5% year-over-year, compared to -446. 7% for Virpax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VRPX or DBVT?
Virpax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(VRPX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRPX leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRPX leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VRPX or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is VRPX or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virpax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(VRPX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRPX: -100. 0%, DBVT: -88. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VRPX and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare DBVT vs ALKS
ALKS is one of the most direct listed alternatives to DBVT.
Compare VRPX vs NKTR
NKTR overlaps with VRPX in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With ABBV + MRK
ABBV and MRK are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.