VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$137.86B
5Y Perf.+2719.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VRT vs IR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$30.80B
5Y Perf.+178.9%
VRT vs IR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VRT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $137.86B | $30.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.84B | $7.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.56B | $587M |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | 55.9x | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.40B | $4.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.73B | $1.25B |
VRT vs IR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VRT
IR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) | 100 | 2819.5 | +2719.5% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) | 100 | 278.9 | +178.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRT vs IR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VRT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Ingersoll Rand Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
The Growth Play
VRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.7%, EPS growth 166.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.6%
- 35.5% 10Y total return vs IR's 305.0%
- 27.7% revenue growth vs IR's 5.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
The Income Pick
IR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 0.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 47.1%, current ratio 2.06x
- Beta 1.48, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.06x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VRT | 27.7% revenue growth vs IR's 5.7% |
| Value | IR | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 55.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | VRT | 14.4% margin vs IR's 7.5% |
| Stability / Safety | IR | Beta 1.48 vs VRT's 2.42, lower leverage |
| Dividends | VRT | 0.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IR's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VRT | +284.2% vs IR's +3.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | VRT | 13.3% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 28.1% vs 7.8% |
VRT vs IR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
VRT vs IR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLVRTLAGGINGIR
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
1leads
VRTVertiv Holdings Co
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs IRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
VRT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
IR6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
VRT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
VRT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRT and IR operate at a comparable scale, with $10.8B and $7.8B in trailing revenue. VRT is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IR's 7.5%. On growth, VRT holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VRTVertiv Holdings Co | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.8B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.4B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.6B | $587M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.2% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | +7.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +135.7% | +6.5% |
VRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
IR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 54.2x trailing earnings, IR trades at a 48% valuation discount to VRT's 105.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IR's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRT's 63.3x.
| Metric | VRTVertiv Holdings Co | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137.9B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $139.5B | $34.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 105.26x | 54.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.90x | 22.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 63.27x | 17.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.48x | 4.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 35.58x | 3.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.80x | 25.24x |
IR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRT delivers a 42.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $6 for IR. IR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRT's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IR scores 6/9 vs VRT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | VRTVertiv Holdings Co | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +42.1% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.3% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +28.1% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.4% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.96x | 4.53x |
VRT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VRT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRT five years ago would be worth $157,181 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,952 for IR. Over the past 12 months, VRT leads with a +284.2% total return vs IR's +3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRT at 187.8% vs IR's 10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VRTVertiv Holdings Co | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +104.4% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +284.2% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2282.6% | +33.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1471.8% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3548.0% | +305.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +187.8% | +10.2% |
VRT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRT and IR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IR is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VRT's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRT currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs IR's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VRTVertiv Holdings Co | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $359.55 | $100.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $91.81 | $72.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +77.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 3.2M |
Evenly matched — VRT and IR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VRT and IR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VRT as "Buy" and IR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for IR (target: $100) vs -8.7% for VRT (target: $328). IR is the only dividend payer here at 0.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | VRTVertiv Holdings Co | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $327.82 | $99.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
Evenly matched — VRT and IR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
VRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VRT vs IR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRT or IR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) is the stronger pick with 27.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) offers the better valuation at 54. 2x trailing P/E (22. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VRT or IR?
On trailing P/E, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is the cheapest at 54. 2x versus Vertiv Holdings Co at 105. 3x. On forward P/E, Ingersoll Rand Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VRT or IR?
Over the past 5 years, Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) delivered a total return of +1472%, compared to +59.
5% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRT returned +35. 5% versus IR's +305. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VRT or IR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Vertiv Holdings Co's 2. 42β — meaning VRT is approximately 63% more volatile than IR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 86% for Vertiv Holdings Co — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VRT or IR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) is pulling ahead at 27.
7% versus 5. 7% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertiv Holdings Co grew EPS 166. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRT leads at 21. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VRT or IR?
Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus 7. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRT leads at 18. 5% versus 18. 5% for IR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IR leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VRT or IR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 55. 9x for Vertiv Holdings Co — 33. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IR: 26. 5% to $99. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VRT or IR?
In this comparison, IR (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. VRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VRT or IR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+305. 0% 10Y return). Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IR: +305. 0%, VRT: +35. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VRT and IR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VRT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(VRT: 30.1% · IR: 7.6%)Net Margin>
%
(VRT: 14.4% · IR: 7.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(VRT: 105.3x · IR: 54.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.