VSH vs ON

For growth investors, Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.

(VSH) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) offers the better valuation at 346. 8x trailing P/E (34. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 34.

4x.

Over the past 5 years, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) delivered a total return of +160.

4%, compared to +40. 6% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ON returned +1004% versus VSH's +194. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

95β versus Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 's 2. 43β — meaning VSH is approximately 25% more volatile than ON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 56% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.

(VSH) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. grew EPS 71. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSH leads at -4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

0% net margin versus -0. 3% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ON leads at 12. 5% versus 1. 9% for VSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ON leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 34.

4x forward P/E versus 60. 4x for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VSH: -23. 3% to $25. 00.

In this comparison, VSH (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. ON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1004% 10Y return).

Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH) carries a higher beta of 2. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ON: +1004%, VSH: +194. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

VSH pays a dividend while ON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.