VSTA vs WMT

For growth investors, Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA) is the stronger pick with 12.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA) offers the better valuation at 4. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA) is the cheapest at 4.

1x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -45. 7% for Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus VSTA's -74. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately 201% more volatile than VSTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA) is pulling ahead at 12.

6% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vasta Platform Limited grew EPS 695. 1% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSTA leads at 20. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Vasta Platform Limited (VSTA) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

1% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VSTA leads at 21. 8% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VSTA leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, WMT (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. VSTA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, VSTA: -74. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VSTA is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while VSTA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.