Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VSTM logo
VSTM
KPTI logo
KPTI
MGNX logo
MGNX
KO logo
KO
FATE logo
FATE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs KO vs FATE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VSTM
Verastem, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$284M
5Y Perf.-80.1%
KPTI
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$81M
5Y Perf.-96.7%
MGNX
MacroGenics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$252M
5Y Perf.-85.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$240M
5Y Perf.-94.0%

VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs KO vs FATE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VSTM logoVSTM
KPTI logoKPTI
MGNX logoMGNX
KO logoKO
FATE logoFATE
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnology
Market Cap$284M$81M$252M$355.61B$240M
Revenue (TTM)$50M$151M$157M$49.28B$6M
Net Income (TTM)$-194M$-195M$-70M$13.70B$-130M
Gross Margin83.7%96.0%69.9%61.7%53.8%
Operating Margin-344.6%-55.7%-40.5%29.3%-22.1%
Forward P/E25.3x
Total Debt$77M$234M$107M$45.49B$78M
Cash & Equiv.$205M$61M$57M$10.27B$47M

VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs KO vs FATELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VSTM
KPTI
MGNX
KO
FATE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Verastem, Inc. (VSTM)10019.9-80.1%
Karyopharm Therapeu… (KPTI)1003.3-96.7%
MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX)10014.2-85.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1006.0-94.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs KO vs FATE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Verastem, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. KPTI and MGNX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VSTM
Verastem, Inc.
The Growth Play

VSTM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 209.1%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 128.4%
  • 209.1% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
Best for: growth exposure
KPTI
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.
The Income Pick

KPTI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • beta 1.35
  • Beta 1.35 vs FATE's 1.93
Best for: income & stability
MGNX
MacroGenics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MGNX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.43, current ratio 5.10x
  • Beta 1.43, current ratio 5.10x
  • +155.5% vs VSTM's -30.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 121.1% 10Y total return vs VSTM's -75.2%
  • 27.8% margin vs FATE's -20.6%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs KPTI's -176.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FATE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVSTM logoVSTM209.1% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs FATE's -20.6%
Stability / SafetyKPTI logoKPTIBeta 1.35 vs FATE's 1.93
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MGNX logoMGNX+155.5% vs VSTM's -30.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs KPTI's -176.9%

VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs KO vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VSTMVerastem, Inc.
FY 2025
Government rebates and other incentives
77.7%$4M
Trade discounts and allowances
15.7%$888,000
Returns
6.6%$376,000
KPTIKaryopharm Therapeutics Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
98.0%$28M
Health Care, Other
2.0%$572,000
MGNXMacroGenics, Inc.
FY 2025
Revenue From Collaborative Agreements
62.4%$87M
Contract Manufacturing
37.6%$53M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M

VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs KO vs FATE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGFATE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 7803.0x FATE's $6M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.6%. On growth, MGNX holds the edge at +57.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.KPTI logoKPTIKaryopharm Therap…MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$50M$151M$157M$49.3B$6M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$170M-$84M-$57M$15.5B-$127M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$194M-$195M-$70M$13.7B-$130M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$151M-$59M-$72M$12.6B-$108M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+83.7%+96.0%+69.9%+61.7%+53.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.4%-55.7%-40.5%+29.3%-22.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.9%-129.0%-44.8%+27.8%-20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.0%-39.1%-45.6%+25.5%-17.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.8%+57.5%+12.1%-20.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+61.5%+55.2%+10.8%+18.2%+18.8%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KPTI and MGNX and FATE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.KPTI logoKPTIKaryopharm Therap…MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$284M$81M$252M$355.6B$240M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$156M$254M$301M$390.8B$271M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.36x-0.53x-3.36x27.18x-1.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.19x0.56x1.68x7.42x36.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.97x4.50x10.40x1.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x
Evenly matched — KPTI and MGNX and FATE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VSTM. FATE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNX's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.KPTI logoKPTIKaryopharm Therap…MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.9%-147.8%+41.1%-58.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-91.6%-176.9%-28.4%+13.1%-39.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-144.1%+15.8%-36.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-139.0%-2.0%-34.7%+17.3%-43.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943272
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.34x1.92x1.33x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$128M$173M$50M$35.2B$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$205M$61M$57M$10.3B$47M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$77M$234M$107M$45.5B$78M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-208.73x-3.48x-4.78x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $229 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, MGNX leads with a +155.5% total return vs VSTM's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs KPTI's -33.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.KPTI logoKPTIKaryopharm Therap…MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.3%+32.1%+146.0%+20.3%+108.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-30.3%+117.9%+155.5%+17.2%+47.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.5%-70.1%-31.5%+47.0%-61.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.8%-93.9%-81.0%+65.6%-97.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.2%-92.4%-85.0%+121.1%+15.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-25.4%-33.2%-11.8%+13.7%-27.5%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs VSTM's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.KPTI logoKPTIKaryopharm Therap…MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.64x1.35x1.43x-0.20x1.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.25$10.99$4.64$84.04$2.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.55$3.65$1.19$65.35$0.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.4%+86.4%+85.3%+98.3%+71.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.753.453.360.647.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M450K1.0M12.7M3.2M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: VSTM as "Buy", KPTI as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy", KO as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 345.1% upside for VSTM (target: $18) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.KPTI logoKPTIKaryopharm Therap…MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.25$14.17$6.00$86.13$5.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1920224831
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs KO vs FATE: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Verastem, Inc.

(VSTM) is the stronger pick with 209. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -97. 7% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus KPTI's -92. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning FATE is approximately -1065% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 192% for MacroGenics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verastem, Inc.

(VSTM) is pulling ahead at 209. 1% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fate Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -90. 5% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSTM leads at 128. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KPTI leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VSTM: 345.

1% to $18. 25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. VSTM, KPTI, MGNX, FATE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or KO or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FATE: +15. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between VSTM and KPTI and MGNX and KO and FATE?

These companies operate in different sectors (VSTM (Healthcare) and KPTI (Healthcare) and MGNX (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and FATE (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VSTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; KPTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while VSTM, KPTI, MGNX, FATE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.