Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs TGTX vs IMVT vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs TGTX vs IMVT vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $273M | $77M | $255M | $7.36B | $6.75B | $355.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $151M | $157M | $700M | $0.00 | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-194M | $-195M | $-70M | $462M | $-506M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 83.7% | 96.0% | 69.9% | 83.0% | — | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -344.6% | -55.7% | -40.5% | 21.3% | — | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 37.4x | — | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $77M | $234M | $107M | $261M | $72K | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $61M | $57M | $79M | $902M | $10.27B |
VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs TGTX vs IMVT vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| Karyopharm Therapeu… (KPTI) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX) | 100 | 14.2 | -85.8% |
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 194.8 | +94.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 176.8 | +76.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs TGTX vs IMVT vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSTM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 209.1% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Among these 6 stocks, KPTI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MGNX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +134.5% vs VSTM's -34.0%
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 40.2%, current ratio 4.10x
- Beta 0.74, current ratio 4.10x
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 230.5% 10Y total return vs TGTX's 5.8%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 209.1% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs VSTM's -391.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs IMVT's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.5% vs VSTM's -34.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs KPTI's -176.9% |
VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs TGTX vs IMVT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs TGTX vs IMVT vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
KO leads 3 • VSTM leads 0 • KPTI leads 0 • MGNX leads 0 • IMVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSTM's -3.9%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $151M | $157M | $700M | $0 | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$170M | -$84M | -$57M | $150M | -$532M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$194M | -$195M | -$70M | $462M | -$506M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$151M | -$59M | -$72M | -$14M | -$407M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.7% | +96.0% | +69.9% | +83.0% | — | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -55.7% | -40.5% | +21.3% | — | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -129.0% | -44.8% | +66.0% | — | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -39.1% | -45.6% | -2.0% | — | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.8% | +57.5% | +69.6% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.5% | +55.2% | +10.8% | +2.9% | -14.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, TGTX trades at a 36% valuation discount to KO's 27.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KO's 26.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 61.0x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $273M | $77M | $255M | $7.4B | $6.8B | $355.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $145M | $250M | $304M | $7.5B | $5.8B | $390.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.30x | -0.50x | -3.40x | 17.35x | -11.87x | 27.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 37.39x | — | 25.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 61.00x | — | 26.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.83x | 0.53x | 1.70x | 11.94x | — | 7.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.77x | — | 4.56x | 11.97x | 7.04x | 10.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 67.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VSTM. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNX's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.9% | — | -147.8% | +87.4% | -68.2% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -91.6% | -176.9% | -28.4% | +42.8% | -62.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -144.1% | +16.4% | — | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.0% | -2.0% | -34.7% | +17.7% | -68.3% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | — | 1.92x | 0.40x | 0.00x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$128M | $173M | $50M | $182M | -$902M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $61M | $57M | $79M | $902M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $234M | $107M | $261M | $72,000 | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -208.73x | -3.48x | -4.78x | 5.67x | — | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for KPTI. Over the past 12 months, MGNX leads with a +134.5% total return vs VSTM's -34.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGTX at 22.4% vs KPTI's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.5% | +25.2% | +149.1% | +64.1% | +26.9% | +20.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.0% | +105.0% | +134.5% | +25.4% | +103.6% | +17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.2% | -71.7% | -30.6% | +83.4% | +51.6% | +46.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | -94.2% | -81.2% | +27.2% | +207.0% | +63.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | -92.8% | -84.8% | +584.5% | +230.5% | +120.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.4% | -34.3% | -11.5% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs VSTM's 35.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.50x | 1.59x | 0.74x | 1.67x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.25 | $10.99 | $4.64 | $49.30 | $36.27 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.55 | $3.65 | $1.19 | $25.28 | $14.32 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.0% | +81.9% | +86.4% | +97.5% | +90.6% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.1 | 54.9 | 49.1 | 73.8 | 51.9 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 442K | 1.0M | 1.9M | 1.9M | 12.6M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VSTM as "Buy", KPTI as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy", TGTX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 363.2% upside for VSTM (target: $18) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $14.17 | $6.00 | $54.50 | $43.67 | $86.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 20 | 22 | 13 | 23 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
VSTM vs KPTI vs MGNX vs TGTX vs IMVT vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verastem, Inc.
(VSTM) is the stronger pick with 209. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (KPTI). TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (37. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO?
On trailing P/E, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -94. 2% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (KPTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +584. 5% versus KPTI's -92. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning IMVT is approximately -1232% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 192% for MacroGenics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verastem, Inc.
(VSTM) is pulling ahead at 209. 1% versus 0. 6% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (KPTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -90. 5% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -677. 6% for Verastem, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -550. 3% for VSTM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KPTI leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25.
2x forward P/E versus 37. 4x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VSTM: 363. 2% to $18. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. VSTM, KPTI, MGNX, TGTX, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VSTM or KPTI or MGNX or TGTX or IMVT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 5% yield, +120. 9% 10Y return). Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +120. 9%, VSTM: -76. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSTM and KPTI and MGNX and TGTX and IMVT and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (VSTM (Healthcare) and KPTI (Healthcare) and MGNX (Healthcare) and TGTX (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VSTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; KPTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while VSTM, KPTI, MGNX, TGTX, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.