VTLE vs FANG

For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) offers the better valuation at 33. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) delivered a total return of +163. 7%, compared to -51. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FANG returned +162. 5% versus VTLE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately 1353% more volatile than FANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus 26. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diamondback Energy, Inc. grew EPS -63. 1% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 1% net margin versus -8. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus -1. 2% for VTLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FANG leads at 35. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.

(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 28. 3% to $23. 00.

In this comparison, FANG (2.

1% yield) pays a dividend. VTLE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 2. 1% yield, +162. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FANG: +162. 5%, VTLE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

FANG pays a dividend while VTLE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.