Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VTS vs NOG vs VTLE vs CIVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
VTS vs NOG vs VTLE vs CIVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $757M | $2.53B | $693M | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $275M | $2.06B | $1.90B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-623M | $-1.31B | $638M |
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 30.6% | 44.2% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 26.0% | -58.3% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | 43.0x | 6.8x | 4.0x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $2.40B | $2.55B | $4.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $14M | $40M | $76M |
VTS vs NOG vs VTLE vs CIVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
| Northern Oil and Ga… (NOG) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VTS vs NOG vs VTLE vs CIVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VTS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 12.8%
- 42.4% 10Y total return vs NOG's -34.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.39, yield 12.8%, current ratio 1.02x
NOG is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
VTLE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.8x)
- +28.7% vs VTS's +0.6%
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs NOG's -3.2%
- 13.6% margin vs VTLE's -69.3%
- 4.2% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 10.8% vs -0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs NOG's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs VTLE's -69.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs VTLE's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.7% vs VTS's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 10.8% vs -0.3% |
VTS vs NOG vs VTLE vs CIVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VTS vs NOG vs VTLE vs CIVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VTS leads in 2 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • VTLE leads 1 • NOG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 17.1x VTS's $275M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTLE's -69.3%. On growth, VTS holds the edge at +1.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $275M | $2.1B | $1.9B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $152M | $1.3B | -$334M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$623M | -$1.3B | $638M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $92M | -$115M | $656M | $934M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +30.6% | +44.2% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +26.0% | -58.3% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | -30.3% | -69.3% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | -5.6% | +34.6% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | -6.2% | -8.4% | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.8% | -4.8% | -2.6% | -33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 95% valuation discount to NOG's 61.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VTS's 6.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $757M | $2.5B | $693M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $885M | $4.9B | $3.2B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.38x | 61.38x | -3.78x | 3.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.95x | 6.80x | 3.98x | 6.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.04x | 3.44x | 4.46x | 1.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 1.21x | 0.36x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.12x | 0.24x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | 10.02x | — | 2.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VTS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. VTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NOG's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VTS scores 7/9 vs VTLE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | -29.1% | -74.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -11.3% | -27.9% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +10.0% | -0.3% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +12.4% | -0.5% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.13x | 0.95x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $128M | $2.4B | $2.5B | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $14M | $40M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $2.4B | $2.6B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.69x | 0.94x | -5.04x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VTS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NOG five years ago would be worth $18,177 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,815 for VTLE. Over the past 12 months, VTLE leads with a +28.7% total return vs VTS's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VTS at 10.5% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +10.8% | — | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.6% | +5.3% | +28.7% | +6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.1% | -9.4% | -59.0% | -41.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.4% | +81.8% | -51.9% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.4% | -34.4% | -92.1% | -86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.5% | -3.3% | -25.7% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VTS and VTLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTLE currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs VTS's 66.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 0.60x | 1.32x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.15 | $32.62 | $22.10 | $37.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.22 | $20.18 | $13.65 | $25.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +73.4% | +81.1% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 37.3 | 53.2 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 583K | 2.7M | 17 | 22.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NOG and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VTS as "Buy", NOG as "Buy", VTLE as "Hold", CIVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 56.9% upside for VTS (target: $29) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs NOG's 7.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $29.00 | $23.00 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 36 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +12.8% | +7.3% | — | +18.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.33 | $1.75 | — | $4.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% | +0.5% | +18.3% |
VTS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CIVI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
VTS vs NOG vs VTLE vs CIVI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. at 61. 4x. On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI?
Over the past 5 years, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
(NOG) delivered a total return of +81. 8%, compared to -51. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VTS returned +42. 4% versus VTLE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vitesse Energy, Inc.
(VTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately 237% more volatile than VTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 113% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -3. 2% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vitesse Energy, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -8. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NOG leads at 29. 3% versus -1. 2% for VTLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 43. 0x for Vitesse Energy, Inc. — 39. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTS: 56. 9% to $28. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), VTS (12. 8% yield), NOG (7. 3% yield) pay a dividend. VTLE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VTS or NOG or VTLE or CIVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vitesse Energy, Inc.
(VTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 12. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTS: +42. 4%, VTLE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VTS and NOG and VTLE and CIVI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VTS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NOG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock. VTS, NOG, CIVI pay a dividend while VTLE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.