Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VTS vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
VTS vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $757M | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $275M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 28.4x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $20M |
VTS vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 49.1 | -50.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VTS vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VTS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 12.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.39, yield 12.8%, current ratio 1.02x
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs VTS's 42.4%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs VTS's 13.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs VTS's 13.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 28.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs VTS's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs VTS's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs VTS's -2.1%, ROIC 7.2% vs 1.9% |
VTS vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VTS vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $275M annually — 2.8x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTS's -7.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $275M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $152M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $92M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.8% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 83% valuation discount to VTS's 28.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VTS's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TPVG's 9.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $757M | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $885M | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.38x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.04x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VTS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VTS delivers a -3.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. VTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VTS scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $128M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.69x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VTS and TPVG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VTS five years ago would be worth $14,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs VTS's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VTS at 10.5% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.6% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.1% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.4% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.4% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.5% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VTS and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs VTS's 66.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.15 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.22 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 583K | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VTS and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VTS as "Buy" and TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 10.1% for VTS (target: $20). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs VTS's 12.83%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +12.8% | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.33 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VTS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
VTS vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VTS or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 2% for Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VTS or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Vitesse Energy, Inc. at 28. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VTS or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Vitesse Energy, Inc.
(VTS) delivered a total return of +42. 4%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus VTS's +40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VTS or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vitesse Energy, Inc.
(VTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 77β — meaning TPVG is approximately 179% more volatile than VTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VTS or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 13. 2% for Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Vitesse Energy, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VTS or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 9. 2% for Vitesse Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 6. 3% for VTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VTS or TPVG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49.
4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — VTS or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 12. 8% for Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS).
09Is VTS or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vitesse Energy, Inc.
(VTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 12. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTS: +40. 4%, TPVG: +91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VTS and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (VTS (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VTS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.