Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VVPR vs BE vs PLUG vs FCEL vs RUN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VVPR
VivoPower International PLC

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$51M
5Y Perf.-67.7%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$62.75B
5Y Perf.+3150.7%
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.34B
5Y Perf.-25.9%
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$721M
5Y Perf.-78.6%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.49B
5Y Perf.-12.5%

VVPR vs BE vs PLUG vs FCEL vs RUN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VVPR logoVVPR
BE logoBE
PLUG logoPLUG
FCEL logoFCEL
RUN logoRUN
IndustrySolarElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsSolar
Market Cap$51M$62.75B$4.34B$721M$3.49B
Revenue (TTM)$6M$2.45B$710M$170M$3.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-64M$6M$-1.63B$-183M$568M
Gross Margin4.5%31.1%99.8%-15.9%23.5%
Operating Margin-219.0%8.2%38.1%-67.6%-1.8%
Forward P/E123.5x15.3x
Total Debt$29M$2.99B$997M$144M$14.89B
Cash & Equiv.$251K$2.45B$1M$295M$1.24B

VVPR vs BE vs PLUG vs FCEL vs RUNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VVPR
BE
PLUG
FCEL
RUN
StockMay 20May 26Return
VivoPower Internati… (VVPR)10032.3-67.7%
Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE)1003250.7+3150.7%
Plug Power Inc. (PLUG)10074.1-25.9%
FuelCell Energy, In… (FCEL)10021.4-78.6%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)10087.5-12.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VVPR vs BE vs PLUG vs FCEL vs RUN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RUN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. VivoPower International PLC is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. BE and FCEL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VVPR
VivoPower International PLC
The Defensive Pick

VVPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.20, current ratio 1.35x
  • 281.3% revenue growth vs PLUG's 12.9%
  • Beta 2.20 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 9.4% 10Y total return vs RUN's 97.7%
  • +14.1% vs VVPR's -14.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
The Income Pick

FCEL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.90, yield 0.9%
  • Beta 2.90, yield 0.9%, current ratio 6.63x
  • 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and defensive
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Growth Play

RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 17.9% margin vs VVPR's -10.0%
  • 2.5% ROA vs VVPR's -201.8%, ROIC -0.5% vs -35.1%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVVPR logoVVPR281.3% revenue growth vs PLUG's 12.9%
ValueRUN logoRUNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsRUN logoRUN17.9% margin vs VVPR's -10.0%
Stability / SafetyVVPR logoVVPRBeta 2.20 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage
DividendsFCEL logoFCEL0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BE logoBE+14.1% vs VVPR's -14.2%
Efficiency (ROA)RUN logoRUN2.5% ROA vs VVPR's -201.8%, ROIC -0.5% vs -35.1%

VVPR vs BE vs PLUG vs FCEL vs RUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VVPRVivoPower International PLC
FY 2022
Electrical equipment and related services
93.4%$21M
Vehicle spec conversion
3.5%$789,000
Accessories
1.8%$400,000
Conversion kits
1.3%$301,000
Development fees
0.0%$0
BEBloom Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Product
75.6%$1.5B
Service
11.3%$228M
Installation
10.2%$206M
Electricity
3.0%$60M
PLUGPlug Power Inc.
FY 2025
Sale Of Electrolyzers
26.5%$188M
Fuel Delivered To Customers
18.8%$133M
Power Purchase Agreements
15.2%$108M
Sale of cryogenic equipment
13.5%$96M
Services Performed On Fuel Cell Systems And Related Infrastructure
13.3%$94M
Sales Of Fuel Cell Systems
7.6%$54M
Sale Of Hydrogen Infrastructure
3.8%$27M
Other (2)
1.4%$10M
FCELFuelCell Energy, Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity, Generation
53.8%$172M
Product
34.8%$111M
Advanced Technologies
8.3%$27M
Service
3.1%$10M
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M

VVPR vs BE vs PLUG vs FCEL vs RUN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBELAGGINGPLUG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

RUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 495.6x VVPR's $6M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VVPR's -10.0%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVVPR logoVVPRVivoPower Interna…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$2.4B$710M$170M$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M$240M-$1.5B-$84M$541M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$64M$6M-$1.6B-$183M$568M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$9M$233M-$2M-$126M-$751M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.5%+31.1%+99.8%-15.9%+23.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.2%+8.2%+38.1%-67.6%-1.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.0%+0.2%-2.3%-108.0%+17.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-144.3%+9.5%-0.3%-74.2%-23.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-98.9%+130.4%+17.6%+60.7%+43.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.7%+3.3%+95.9%+65.5%+2.1%
BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, RUN's 24.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 513.0x.

MetricVVPR logoVVPRVivoPower Interna…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
Market CapShares × price$51M$62.8B$4.3B$721M$3.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$80M$63.3B$5.3B$570M$17.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.59x-705.49x-1.85x8.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.123.47x15.26x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple513.03x24.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue838.14x31.00x6.12x4.56x1.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.01x79.14x0.48x0.80x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1097.28x
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. FCEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricVVPR logoVVPRVivoPower Interna…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-63.6%+0.8%-124.4%-26.8%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.0%+0.2%-64.3%-20.1%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-35.1%+4.1%+10.9%-14.0%-0.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-69.5%+2.5%+18.6%-13.8%-0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954556
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.45x3.77x19.75x0.20x2.99x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$29M$538M$996M-$151M$13.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$251,000$2.5B$1M$295M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$29M$3.0B$997M$144M$14.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.94x1.05x-36.18x-30.14x-0.02x
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $129,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $466 for VVPR. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1414.1% total return vs VVPR's -14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.8% vs FCEL's -42.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVVPR logoVVPRVivoPower Interna…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.3%+164.5%+39.9%+67.7%-24.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.2%+1414.1%+266.9%+227.0%+71.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-50.1%+1440.0%-66.4%-80.9%-15.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%+1199.3%-84.5%-93.7%-64.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.0%+944.1%+61.7%-99.3%+97.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.7%+148.8%-30.5%-42.4%-5.3%
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — VVPR and FCEL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

VVPR is the less volatile stock with a 2.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCEL currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs VVPR's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVVPR logoVVPRVivoPower Interna…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.20x3.62x2.55x2.90x2.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.88$302.99$4.58$14.30$22.44
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.20$16.47$0.69$3.78$5.38
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.3%+86.2%+68.1%+95.8%+65.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.160.356.261.355.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded408K10.2M75.2M3.9M10.3M
Evenly matched — VVPR and FCEL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", FCEL as "Hold", RUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -36.3% for FCEL (target: $9). FCEL is the only dividend payer here at 0.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVVPR logoVVPRVivoPower Interna…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$187.56$3.91$8.73$18.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts31381937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises021
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$0.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RUN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallBloom Energy Corporation (BE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VVPR vs BE vs PLUG vs FCEL vs RUN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is the stronger pick with 281.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN?

On forward P/E, Sunrun Inc.

is actually cheaper at 15. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN?

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1199%, compared to -95.

3% for VivoPower International PLC (VVPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +944. 1% versus FCEL's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

20β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 62β — meaning BE is approximately 65% more volatile than VVPR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is pulling ahead at 281.

3% versus 12. 9% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1414. 3% for FuelCell Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN?

Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -209. 7% for VivoPower International PLC — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -143. 3% for VVPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 108. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 25. 3% to $3. 91.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN?

In this comparison, FCEL (0.

9% yield) pays a dividend. VVPR, BE, PLUG, RUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is VVPR or BE or PLUG or FCEL or RUN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+944.

1% 10Y return). VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +944. 1%, VVPR: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VVPR and BE and PLUG and FCEL and RUN?

These companies operate in different sectors (VVPR (Energy) and BE (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and FCEL (Industrials) and RUN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VVPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. FCEL pays a dividend while VVPR, BE, PLUG, RUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

VVPR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 65%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PLUG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCEL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VVPR and BE and PLUG and FCEL and RUN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VVPR: -98.9% · BE: 130.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.