VVPR vs CHPT

For growth investors, VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is the stronger pick with 281.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Analysts rate ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) delivered a total return of -95.

3%, compared to -98. 5% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHPT returned -96. 8% versus VVPR's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

20β versus ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning CHPT is approximately 20% more volatile than VVPR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 145% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is pulling ahead at 281.

3% versus -1. 4% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VivoPower International PLC grew EPS 87. 3% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHPT leads at -4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

(CHPT) is the more profitable company, earning -53. 5% net margin versus -209. 7% for VivoPower International PLC — meaning it keeps -53. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHPT leads at -51. 1% versus -143. 3% for VVPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHPT leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

(CHPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHPT: -96. 8%, VVPR: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (VVPR (Energy) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VVPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.