Aerospace & Defense
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VVX vs CAT vs DE vs LDOS vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Information Technology Services
Agricultural - Machinery
VVX vs CAT vs DE vs LDOS vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Information Technology Services | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $2.84B | $423.68B | $155.88B | $15.37B | $13.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.72B | $70.75B | $46.86B | $17.48B | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $89M | $9.42B | $4.78B | $1.36B | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 32.5% | 35.4% | 17.3% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 16.6% | 18.4% | 11.6% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 36.9x | 32.0x | 10.3x | 26.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $43.33B | $63.94B | $5.93B | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $369M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $1.20B | $3.23B |
VVX vs CAT vs DE vs LDOS vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| V2X, Inc. (VVX) | 100 | 184.8 | +84.8% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 719.8 | +619.8% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 367.5 | +267.5% |
| Leidos Holdings, In… (LDOS) | 100 | 130.4 | +30.4% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VVX vs CAT vs DE vs LDOS vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VVX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 126.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.2%
- 4.3% revenue growth vs DE's -11.6%
- 13.3% margin vs VVX's 1.9%
- +153.9% vs LDOS's -16.3%
Among these 5 stocks, DE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LDOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, current ratio 1.70x
- PEG 0.50 vs DE's 1.96
- Beta 0.38, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.70x
CNH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 2.5% yield, vs CAT's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs DE's -11.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 32.0x), PEG 0.50 vs 1.96 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs VVX's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs CAT's 1.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs CAT's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +153.9% vs LDOS's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 15.9% vs 6.6% |
VVX vs CAT vs DE vs LDOS vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VVX vs CAT vs DE vs LDOS vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LDOS leads in 1 of 6 categories
CAT leads 1 • VVX leads 0 • DE leads 0 • CNH leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VVX and CAT and DE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 15.0x VVX's $4.7B. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VVX's 1.9%. On growth, VVX holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $70.8B | $46.9B | $17.5B | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $289M | $14.0B | $10.3B | $2.2B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $89M | $9.4B | $4.8B | $1.4B | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $136M | $11.4B | $3.8B | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +32.5% | +35.4% | +17.3% | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +16.6% | +18.4% | +11.6% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +13.3% | +10.2% | +7.8% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +16.2% | +8.0% | +9.6% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.4% | +22.2% | +6.7% | +3.7% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +140.0% | +30.2% | -1.4% | -7.6% | -94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LDOS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, LDOS trades at a 77% valuation discount to CAT's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LDOS offers better value at 0.53x vs DE's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $423.7B | $155.9B | $15.4B | $13.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $457.0B | $211.5B | $20.1B | $37.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.07x | 48.36x | 31.22x | 10.98x | 25.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.91x | 36.94x | 31.95x | 10.32x | 26.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.72x | 1.91x | 0.53x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.88x | 33.92x | 19.87x | 8.35x | 10.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 6.27x | 3.49x | 0.89x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.66x | 20.03x | 6.03x | 3.26x | 1.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.72x | 41.24x | 48.25x | 9.46x | 6.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VVX and LDOS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNH. VVX carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VVX scores 8/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | +47.5% | +18.2% | +27.1% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +10.0% | +4.5% | +9.4% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +15.9% | +7.8% | +17.1% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +19.1% | +11.7% | +21.0% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 1.19x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $801M | $33.4B | $55.7B | $4.7B | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $369M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $43.3B | $63.9B | $5.9B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.50x | 9.22x | 3.07x | 9.91x | 1.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $42,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,025 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +153.9% total return vs LDOS's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 57.4% vs CNH's -6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.4% | +52.7% | +24.1% | -33.2% | +14.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.7% | +153.9% | +13.0% | -16.3% | -16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.6% | +289.8% | +53.9% | +51.0% | -17.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.2% | +327.7% | +80.1% | +21.6% | -29.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.6% | +1168.9% | +624.8% | +212.3% | +75.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.3% | +57.4% | +15.4% | +14.7% | -6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VVX and LDOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LDOS is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VVX currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs LDOS's 59.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 1.67x | 0.60x | 0.38x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.64 | $946.83 | $674.19 | $205.77 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.80 | $355.70 | $433.00 | $121.20 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +96.2% | +85.7% | +59.4% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.8 | 52.5 | 50.6 | 32.4 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 471K | 2.4M | 1.1M | 1.0M | 12.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAT and CNH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VVX as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", LDOS as "Buy", CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.3% upside for LDOS (target: $187) vs -13.4% for VVX (target: $79). For income investors, CNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.51% vs CAT's 0.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.60 | $882.20 | $690.00 | $187.33 | $13.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 53 | 46 | 27 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +1.1% | +1.3% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 32 | 5 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 | $6.33 | $1.59 | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +6.1% | 0.0% |
LDOS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
VVX vs CAT vs DE vs LDOS vs CNH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 6% for Deere & Company (DE). Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate V2X, Inc. (VVX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH?
On trailing P/E, Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, Leidos Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Leidos Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus Deere & Company's 1. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +327. 7%, compared to -29. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1169% versus CNH's +75. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning CAT is approximately 339% more volatile than LDOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, V2X, Inc. (VVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -11. 6% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: V2X, Inc. grew EPS 126. 9% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VVX leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 1. 7% for V2X, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 4. 3% for VVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus Deere & Company's 1. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 36. 9x for Caterpillar Inc. — 26. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LDOS: 53. 3% to $187. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH?
In this comparison, CNH (2.
5% yield), LDOS (1. 3% yield), DE (1. 1% yield), CAT (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. VVX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VVX or CAT or DE or LDOS or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 1. 1% yield, +624. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +624. 8%, VVX: +251. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VVX and CAT and DE and LDOS and CNH?
These companies operate in different sectors (VVX (Industrials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and LDOS (Technology) and CNH (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VVX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LDOS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CAT, DE, LDOS, CNH pay a dividend while VVX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.