VYX vs PAR

For growth investors, PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is the stronger pick with 30.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX). NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) offers the better valuation at 27. 0x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, NCR Voyix Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.

9x.

Over the past 5 years, NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) delivered a total return of -72.

4%, compared to -80. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation (PAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAR returned +167. 3% versus VYX's -52. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

54β versus NCR Voyix Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning VYX is approximately 9% more volatile than PAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 139% for NCR Voyix Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is pulling ahead at 30.

2% versus -4. 9% for NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCR Voyix Corporation grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAR leads at 20. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

6% net margin versus -18. 5% for PAR Technology Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VYX leads at 1. 0% versus -14. 0% for PAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAR leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) trades at 8.

9x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for PAR Technology Corporation — 19. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAR: 67. 0% to $25. 00.

In this comparison, VYX (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. PAR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

3% yield). PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VYX: -52. 8%, PAR: +167. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VYX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock. VYX pays a dividend while PAR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.