WAB vs GNSS

For growth investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) offers the better valuation at 38. 9x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.

0%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAB returned +247. 1% versus GNSS's +14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning WAB is approximately 27% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus 7. 5% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genasys Inc. grew EPS 44. 4% year-over-year, compared to 13. 1% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAB leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

5% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAB leads at 16. 7% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNSS leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, WAB (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. GNSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNSS: +14. 9%, WAB: +247. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WAB (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.