Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WAL vs IBOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
WAL vs IBOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.16B | $4.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.28B | $1.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $969M | $412M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 49.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $6.48B | $705M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.60B | $536M |
WAL vs IBOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Alliance Ba… (WAL) | 100 | 218.4 | +118.4% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 235.7 | +135.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAL vs IBOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 23.1%
- 5.2% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 10.8x)
IBOC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- 227.0% 10Y total return vs WAL's 168.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.2% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs IBOC's +19.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAL's 0.4% |
WAL vs IBOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WAL vs IBOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 5.0x IBOC's $1.1B. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAL's 18.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $544M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $969M | $412M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $493M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +39.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | +47.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | -7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
WAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, WAL trades at a 13% valuation discount to IBOC's 11.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs WAL's 0.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.2B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.0B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.55x | 10.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.67x | 10.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | 0.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.97x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 4.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $13 for WAL. IBOC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBOC scores 6/9 vs WAL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.8% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $536M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $705M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 2.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WAL and IBOC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,114 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,568 for WAL. Over the past 12 months, WAL leads with a +19.4% total return vs IBOC's +19.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.6% vs IBOC's 23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.4% | +19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.7% | +86.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.3% | +61.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.4% | +227.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.6% | +23.2% |
Risk & Volatility
IBOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs WAL's 85.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.23 | $75.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.81 | $61.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 374K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAL and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WAL as "Buy" and IBOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.1% upside for IBOC (target: $85) vs 5.4% for WAL (target: $88). For income investors, WAL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs IBOC's 1.93%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.83 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.1% |
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WAL vs IBOC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAL or IBOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the stronger pick with 5.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAL or IBOC?
On trailing P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus International Bancshares Corporation at 11. 0x. On forward P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAL or IBOC?
Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.
1%, compared to -14. 3% for Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +227. 0% versus WAL's +168. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAL or IBOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately 109% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAL or IBOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is pulling ahead at 5.
2% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Western Alliance Bancorporation grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for International Bancshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAL or IBOC?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 18. 4% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 22. 9% for WAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAL or IBOC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for International Bancshares Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBOC: 17. 1% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAL or IBOC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 9% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC).
09Is WAL or IBOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +227. 0% 10Y return). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +227. 0%, WAL: +168. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAL and IBOC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.