Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WALD vs IPAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
WALD vs IPAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $153M | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $515M | $1.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-290M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.5% | 18.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $182M | $224M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $158M |
WALD vs IPAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waldencast plc (WALD) | 100 | 14.2 | -85.8% |
| Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) | 100 | 122.9 | +22.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WALD vs IPAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WALD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.5%, EPS growth 56.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 25.5% revenue growth vs IPAR's 2.5%
IPAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 3.4%
- 255.2% 10Y total return vs WALD's -85.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 20.3%, current ratio 2.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.5% revenue growth vs IPAR's 2.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs WALD's -56.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs WALD's 1.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -18.8% vs WALD's -50.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs WALD's -30.3%, ROIC 18.6% vs -4.8% |
WALD vs IPAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WALD vs IPAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.9x WALD's $515M. IPAR is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WALD's -56.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $515M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | $291M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$290M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $199M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +64.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | +18.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.3% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | +13.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.5% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.6% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WALD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IPAR's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WALD's 223.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $153M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $320M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.59x | 17.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 223.84x | 11.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPAR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IPAR delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-41 for WALD. IPAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WALD's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPAR scores 4/9 vs WALD's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.3% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.3% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.8% | +18.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $167M | $66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $182M | $224M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.06x | 50.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IPAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IPAR five years ago would be worth $14,188 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,421 for WALD. Over the past 12 months, IPAR leads with a -18.8% total return vs WALD's -50.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IPAR at -12.4% vs WALD's -46.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.1% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.0% | -18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | -32.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.8% | +41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.8% | +255.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.0% | -12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
IPAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPAR is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WALD's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IPAR currently trades 65.9% from its 52-week high vs WALD's 43.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.22 | $142.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $77.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.5% | +65.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 259K |
Analyst Outlook
IPAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WALD as "Buy" and IPAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for WALD (target: $3) vs 14.4% for IPAR (target: $108). IPAR is the only dividend payer here at 3.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $107.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
IPAR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WALD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
WALD vs IPAR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WALD or IPAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Waldencast plc (WALD) is the stronger pick with 25.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR). Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Waldencast plc (WALD) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WALD or IPAR?
Over the past 5 years, Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) delivered a total return of +41. 9%, compared to -85. 8% for Waldencast plc (WALD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPAR returned +255. 2% versus WALD's -85. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WALD or IPAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Waldencast plc's 1. 60β — meaning WALD is approximately 194% more volatile than IPAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 25% for Waldencast plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WALD or IPAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Waldencast plc (WALD) is pulling ahead at 25.
5% versus 2. 5% for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Waldencast plc grew EPS 56. 2% year-over-year, compared to 2. 3% for Inter Parfums, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WALD leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WALD or IPAR?
Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus -15. 5% for Waldencast plc — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IPAR leads at 18. 2% versus -21. 4% for WALD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IPAR leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WALD or IPAR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WALD: 78.
6% to $2. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — WALD or IPAR?
In this comparison, IPAR (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. WALD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WALD or IPAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 3. 4% yield, +255. 2% 10Y return). Waldencast plc (WALD) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IPAR: +255. 2%, WALD: -85. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WALD and IPAR?
These companies operate in different sectors (WALD (Technology) and IPAR (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WALD is a small-cap high-growth stock; IPAR is a small-cap deep-value stock. IPAR pays a dividend while WALD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.