WATT vs POWI

For growth investors, Energous Corporation (WATT) is the stronger pick with 62.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) offers the better valuation at 200. 6x trailing P/E (60. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Power Integrations, Inc.

(POWI) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -98. 2% for Energous Corporation (WATT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWI returned +264. 8% versus WATT's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Energous Corporation (WATT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

69β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning POWI is approximately 23% more volatile than WATT relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energous Corporation (WATT) is pulling ahead at 62.

0% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Energous Corporation grew EPS 38. 1% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WATT leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Power Integrations, Inc.

(POWI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -24. 0% for Energous Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POWI leads at 4. 8% versus -24. 0% for WATT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, POWI (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. WATT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Power Integrations, Inc.

(POWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield, +264. 8% 10Y return). Energous Corporation (WATT) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POWI: +264. 8%, WATT: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WATT is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while WATT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.