Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WAVE vs GPRE vs REX vs CWCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Regulated Water
WAVE vs GPRE vs REX vs CWCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $48M | $1.15B | $1.60B | $529M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $168K | $1.94B | $651M | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-15M | $50M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 1.8% | 12.7% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | 1.2% | 8.6% | 139015.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 46.6x | 62.8x | 31.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $508M | $21M | $708.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $182M | $196M | $123.79T |
WAVE vs GPRE vs REX vs CWCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eco Wave Power Glob… (WAVE) | 100 | 100.9 | +0.9% |
| Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) | 100 | 46.5 | -53.5% |
| REX American Resour… (REX) | 100 | 356.1 | +256.1% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 261.7 | +161.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAVE vs GPRE vs REX vs CWCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAVE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GPRE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +336.6% vs WAVE's +35.0%
REX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 464.7% 10Y total return vs CWCO's 155.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
- Beta 0.36, current ratio 8.64x
- Beta 0.36 vs WAVE's 1.25, lower leverage
CWCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth -1.4%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.0%
- -1.4% revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3%
- Lower P/E (31.6x vs 62.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.4% revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.6x vs 62.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs WAVE's -17.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs WAVE's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +336.6% vs WAVE's +35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs WAVE's -30.7%, ROIC 11.4% vs -205.2% |
WAVE vs GPRE vs REX vs CWCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WAVE vs GPRE vs REX vs CWCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWCO leads in 4 of 6 categories
REX leads 2 • WAVE leads 0 • GPRE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 11523.6x WAVE's $168,000. CWCO is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAVE's -17.6%. On growth, CWCO holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $168,000 | $1.9B | $651M | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $122M | $67M | $25.98T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$15M | $50M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $90M | $18M | $33.67T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +1.8% | +12.7% | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +1.2% | +8.6% | +139015.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.6% | -0.8% | +7.7% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.2% | +4.7% | +2.7% | +254916.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.9% | +0.4% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -177.8% | +134.2% | +2.9% | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CWCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, REX's 16.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 103.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48M | $1.1B | $1.6B | $529M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $1.5B | $1.4B | -$123.08T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.83x | -9.14x | 29.50x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 46.62x | 62.81x | 31.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 103.82x | 16.60x | -4.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1254.97x | 0.55x | 2.50x | 4.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.74x | 1.44x | 2.67x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.84x | — | 0.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REX delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-41 for WAVE. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPRE's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REX scores 5/9 vs WAVE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.9% | -2.0% | +7.7% | 0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.7% | -1.0% | +6.7% | 0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | -5.2% | +11.4% | +26.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.1% | -6.2% | +10.1% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.66x | 0.03x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $326M | -$175M | -$123.08T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $182M | $196M | $123.79T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $508M | $21M | $708.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.45x | -0.08x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REX five years ago would be worth $34,996 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,369 for WAVE. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +336.6% total return vs WAVE's +35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 50.8% vs GPRE's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.4% | +60.1% | +50.2% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +336.6% | +147.6% | +47.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.5% | -46.8% | +243.1% | +101.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | -48.5% | +250.0% | +197.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +21.3% | +464.7% | +155.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.4% | -19.0% | +50.8% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
REX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REX is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAVE's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REX currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs WAVE's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.22x | 0.36x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.87 | $18.94 | $53.36 | $39.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.41 | $3.39 | $19.44 | $22.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +86.9% | +91.2% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 54.3 | 59.1 | 47.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 1.5M | 204K | 163K |
Analyst Outlook
CWCO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GPRE as "Buy", REX as "Buy", CWCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -16.2% for GPRE (target: $14). CWCO is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.80 | $60.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 3 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $497756.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.6% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
CWCO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). REX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
WAVE vs GPRE vs REX vs CWCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the stronger pick with -1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). REX American Resources Corporation (REX) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (62. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO?
On forward P/E, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. is actually cheaper at 31. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO?
Over the past 5 years, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) delivered a total return of +250.
0%, compared to -56. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REX returned +464. 7% versus WAVE's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)'s 1. 25β — meaning WAVE is approximately 242% more volatile than REX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 66% for Green Plains Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is pulling ahead at -1. 4% versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: REX American Resources Corporation grew EPS -4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAVE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO?
Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus -97. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus -84. 2% for WAVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWCO leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) trades at 31. 6x forward P/E versus 62. 8x for REX American Resources Corporation — 31. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 23. 3% to $60. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. WAVE, GPRE, REX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WAVE or GPRE or REX or CWCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), +464. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REX: +464. 7%, WAVE: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAVE and GPRE and REX and CWCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (WAVE (Utilities) and GPRE (Basic Materials) and REX (Basic Materials) and CWCO (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WAVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWCO pays a dividend while WAVE, GPRE, REX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.