Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
WBI logo
WBI
COP logo
COP
FANG logo
FANG
OXY logo
OXY
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WBI
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC

Oil & Gas Energy

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+3.9%
COP
ConocoPhillips

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$140.61B
5Y Perf.+174.5%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.90B
5Y Perf.+358.1%
OXY
Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$55.17B
5Y Perf.+203.1%

WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WBI logoWBI
COP logoCOP
FANG logoFANG
OXY logoOXY
IndustryOil & Gas EnergyOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$1.43B$140.61B$53.90B$55.17B
Revenue (TTM)$548M$58.31B$15.19B$23.18B
Net Income (TTM)$16M$7.32B$403M$4.71B
Gross Margin24.5%29.2%41.8%26.2%
Operating Margin14.7%18.3%22.1%12.4%
Forward P/E58.8x11.3x9.4x10.2x
Total Debt$13M$23.44B$14.49B$23.96B
Cash & Equiv.$52M$6.50B$106M$1.99B

WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WBI
COP
FANG
OXY
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
ConocoPhillips (COP)100274.5+174.5%
Diamondback Energy,… (FANG)100458.1+358.1%
Occidental Petroleu… (OXY)100303.1+203.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FANG leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Occidental Petroleum Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. WBI and COP also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇FANG emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
WBI
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
The Defensive Pick

WBI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 1.38x
  • Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 65.5%)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
COP
ConocoPhillips
The Income Pick

COP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta -0.18, yield 2.8%
  • 220.0% 10Y total return vs FANG's 156.1%
  • 6.0% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 3.3%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The Growth Play

FANG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
  • 36.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
  • Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.2x)
  • +31.4% vs WBI's +21.5%
Best for: growth exposure
OXY
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
The Defensive Pick

OXY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta -0.43, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.94x
  • 20.3% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
  • 2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COP's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFANG logoFANG36.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
ValueFANG logoFANGLower P/E (9.4x vs 10.2x)
Quality / MarginsOXY logoOXY20.3% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
Stability / SafetyWBI logoWBILower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 65.5%)
DividendsOXY logoOXY2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COP's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FANG logoFANG+31.4% vs WBI's +21.5%
Efficiency (ROA)COP logoCOP6.0% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 3.3%

WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Oil & Gas Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Oil & Gas Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
WBIWaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
FY 2025
Produced Water Handling
92.7%$472M
Skim Oil
7.3%$37M
COPConocoPhillips
FY 2025
Crude oil product line
75.7%$39.1B
Natural Gas Product Line
17.1%$8.9B
Natural Gas Liquids
7.2%$3.7B
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Oil Exploration and Production
88.3%$25.1B
Oil Purchased
5.2%$1.5B
Natural Gas Liquids Production
5.0%$1.4B
Natural Gas, Production
1.4%$400M
OXYOccidental Petroleum Corporation
FY 2025
Oil And Gas Segment
94.3%$20.9B
Midstream Segment
5.7%$1.3B

WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWBILAGGINGOXY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FANG and OXY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.3B annually — 106.3x WBI's $548M. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, WBI holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWBI logoWBIWaterBridge Infra…COP logoCOPConocoPhillipsFANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…OXY logoOXYOccidental Petrol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$548M$58.3B$15.2B$23.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$249M$22.4B$8.6B$10.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$16M$7.3B$403M$4.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$135M$18.3B$1.6B$3.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+29.2%+41.8%+26.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.7%+18.3%+22.1%+12.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.9%+12.6%+2.7%+20.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-24.6%+31.4%+10.5%+15.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.8%-2.5%+5.2%-23.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%-20.2%-98.3%+3.1%
Evenly matched — FANG and OXY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.2x trailing earnings, COP trades at a 47% valuation discount to OXY's 34.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WBI's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.9x.

MetricWBI logoWBIWaterBridge Infra…COP logoCOPConocoPhillipsFANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…OXY logoOXYOccidental Petrol…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$140.6B$53.9B$55.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$157.6B$68.3B$77.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-305.00x18.17x33.44x34.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.58.76x11.33x9.42x10.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.35x6.80x6.86x6.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.73x2.39x3.59x2.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.71x2.24x1.29x1.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.38x10.30x13.44x
WBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — WBI and COP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

OXY delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBI. WBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OXY's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBI scores 7/9 vs OXY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWBI logoWBIWaterBridge Infra…COP logoCOPConocoPhillipsFANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…OXY logoOXYOccidental Petrol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.9%+11.3%+0.9%+12.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%+6.0%+0.6%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.3%+10.4%+6.7%+4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%+10.4%+7.6%+4.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97644
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.36x0.34x0.65x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$39M$16.9B$14.4B$22.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$52M$6.5B$106M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$23.4B$14.5B$24.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.30x9.42x0.66x3.25x
Evenly matched — WBI and COP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $25,659 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,148 for WBI. Over the past 12 months, FANG leads with a +31.4% total return vs WBI's +21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 17.5% vs OXY's -0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWBI logoWBIWaterBridge Infra…COP logoCOPConocoPhillipsFANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…OXY logoOXYOccidental Petrol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.5%+21.0%+27.2%+32.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+21.5%+27.1%+31.4%+25.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.5%+22.2%+62.0%-1.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.5%+123.2%+156.6%+108.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.5%+220.0%+156.1%-6.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.7%+6.9%+17.5%-0.6%
FANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WBI and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OXY is the less volatile stock with a -0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FANG's -0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBI currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs OXY's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWBI logoWBIWaterBridge Infra…COP logoCOPConocoPhillipsFANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…OXY logoOXYOccidental Petrol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.18x-0.14x-0.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.90$135.87$214.51$67.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$23.18$85.57$134.30$39.26
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.6%+84.9%+89.3%+82.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.852.048.747.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded599K6.8M2.5M11.6M
Evenly matched — WBI and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — COP and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WBI as "Buy", COP as "Buy", FANG as "Buy", OXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for COP (target: $133) vs 11.5% for WBI (target: $34). For income investors, OXY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.87% vs FANG's 2.09%.

MetricWBI logoWBIWaterBridge Infra…COP logoCOPConocoPhillipsFANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…OXY logoOXYOccidental Petrol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.00$132.92$217.79$62.31
# AnalystsCovering analysts5525152
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+2.1%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0984
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.19$4.00$1.59
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.6%+3.7%0.0%
Evenly matched — COP and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WBI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FANG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallWaterBridge Infrastructure … (WBI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WBI or COP or FANG or OXY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). ConocoPhillips (COP) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY?

On trailing P/E, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the cheapest at 18.

2x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 34. 5x. On forward P/E, Diamondback Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY?

Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) delivered a total return of +156. 6%, compared to +21. 5% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +220. 0% versus OXY's -6. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

43β versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. 's -0. 14β — meaning FANG is approximately -67% more volatile than OXY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 65% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ConocoPhillips grew EPS -18. 7% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY?

ConocoPhillips (COP) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

6% net margin versus -0. 9% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 15. 0% for WBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FANG leads at 35. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WBI or COP or FANG or OXY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 58. 8x for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — 49. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COP: 15. 2% to $132. 92.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY?

In this comparison, OXY (2.

9% yield), COP (2. 8% yield), FANG (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. WBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WBI or COP or FANG or OXY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

43), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OXY: -6. 0%, WBI: +21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WBI and COP and FANG and OXY?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. COP, FANG, OXY pay a dividend while WBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.