Oil & Gas Energy
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WBI vs COP vs KO vs FANG vs OXY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
WBI vs COP vs KO vs FANG vs OXY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $140.61B | $355.22B | $53.90B | $55.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $548M | $58.31B | $49.28B | $15.19B | $23.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $7.32B | $13.70B | $403M | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 29.2% | 61.7% | 41.8% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 18.3% | 29.3% | 22.1% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 62.5x | 11.3x | 25.2x | 9.4x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $23.44B | $45.49B | $14.49B | $23.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $6.50B | $10.27B | $106M | $1.99B |
WBI vs COP vs KO vs FANG vs OXY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 278.4 | +178.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 459.4 | +359.4% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 309.0 | +209.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBI vs COP vs KO vs FANG vs OXY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 1.38x
- Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 132.7%)
COP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta -0.18, yield 2.8%
- 220.0% 10Y total return vs FANG's 156.1%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta -0.15, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
- 27.8% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.3%
FANG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.2x)
- +31.4% vs KO's +17.4%
OXY is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs FANG's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 132.7%) | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.4% vs KO's +17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.3% |
WBI vs COP vs KO vs FANG vs OXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBI vs COP vs KO vs FANG vs OXY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
WBI leads 1 • FANG leads 1 • COP leads 0 • OXY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.3B annually — 106.3x WBI's $548M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, WBI holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $548M | $58.3B | $49.3B | $15.2B | $23.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $22.4B | $15.5B | $8.6B | $10.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $7.3B | $13.7B | $403M | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $18.3B | $12.6B | $1.6B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +29.2% | +61.7% | +41.8% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +18.3% | +29.3% | +22.1% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +12.6% | +27.8% | +2.7% | +20.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +31.4% | +25.5% | +10.5% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -2.5% | +12.1% | +5.2% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -20.2% | +18.2% | -98.3% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.2x trailing earnings, COP trades at a 47% valuation discount to OXY's 34.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WBI's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $140.6B | $355.2B | $53.9B | $55.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $157.6B | $390.4B | $68.3B | $77.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -305.00x | 18.17x | 27.15x | 33.44x | 34.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.49x | 11.33x | 25.24x | 9.42x | 10.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.35x | 6.80x | 26.36x | 6.86x | 6.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 2.39x | 7.41x | 3.59x | 2.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 2.24x | 10.39x | 1.29x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.38x | 67.07x | 10.30x | 13.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBI. WBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBI scores 7/9 vs OXY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +11.3% | +41.1% | +0.9% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +6.0% | +13.1% | +0.6% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +10.4% | +15.8% | +6.7% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +10.4% | +17.3% | +7.6% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.36x | 1.33x | 0.34x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | $16.9B | $35.2B | $14.4B | $22.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $6.5B | $10.3B | $106M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $23.4B | $45.5B | $14.5B | $24.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 9.42x | 10.70x | 0.66x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $25,659 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,148 for WBI. Over the past 12 months, FANG leads with a +31.4% total return vs KO's +17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 17.5% vs OXY's -0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | +21.0% | +20.2% | +27.2% | +32.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +27.1% | +17.4% | +31.4% | +25.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +22.2% | +46.9% | +62.0% | -1.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +123.2% | +63.6% | +156.6% | +108.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +220.0% | +120.9% | +156.1% | -6.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +6.9% | +13.7% | +17.5% | -0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OXY is the less volatile stock with a -0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FANG's -0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs OXY's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | -0.18x | -0.20x | -0.18x | -0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.90 | $135.87 | $84.04 | $214.51 | $67.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.18 | $85.57 | $65.35 | $134.30 | $39.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +84.9% | +98.2% | +89.3% | +82.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 52.0 | 65.7 | 48.7 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 6.8M | 12.6M | 2.5M | 11.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBI as "Buy", COP as "Buy", KO as "Buy", FANG as "Buy", OXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for COP (target: $133) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, OXY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.87% vs FANG's 2.09%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $132.92 | $86.29 | $217.79 | $62.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 52 | 48 | 51 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +2.5% | +2.1% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 56 | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.19 | $2.04 | $4.00 | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +0.2% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WBI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WBI vs COP vs KO vs FANG vs OXY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). ConocoPhillips (COP) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY?
On trailing P/E, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the cheapest at 18.
2x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 34. 5x. On forward P/E, Diamondback Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) delivered a total return of +156. 6%, compared to +21. 5% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +220. 0% versus OXY's -4. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
45β versus ConocoPhillips's -0. 18β — meaning COP is approximately -60% more volatile than OXY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -0. 9% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 15. 0% for WBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — 53. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COP: 15. 2% to $132. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY?
In this comparison, OXY (2.
9% yield), COP (2. 8% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), FANG (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. WBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBI or COP or KO or FANG or OXY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
45), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OXY: -4. 6%, WBI: +29. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBI and COP and KO and FANG and OXY?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBI (Energy) and COP (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and FANG (Energy) and OXY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. COP, KO, FANG, OXY pay a dividend while WBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.