Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WBUY vs FTFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
WBUY vs FTFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1M | $7M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 5.2% | 10.7% |
| Operating Margin | -20.0% | -8.9% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $2M |
WBUY vs FTFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. O… (WBUY) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBUY vs FTFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBUY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.56
- -75.1% 10Y total return vs FTFT's -98.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.56, Low D/E 72.6%, current ratio 1.15x
FTFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
- 77.5% revenue growth vs WBUY's -67.7%
- -4.8% vs WBUY's -59.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.5% revenue growth vs WBUY's -67.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -15.6% margin vs FTFT's -120.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.56 vs FTFT's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.8% vs WBUY's -59.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.9% ROA vs WBUY's -57.5%, ROIC -97.5% vs -104.7% |
WBUY vs FTFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBUY vs FTFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WBUY and FTFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WBUY is the larger business by revenue, generating $77M annually — 20.1x FTFT's $4M. WBUY is the more profitable business, keeping -15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTFT's -120.6%. On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$34M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $56.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +10.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.0% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | -120.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +14767.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.8% | +110.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.8% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FTFT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $7M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $717,833 | $7M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.23x | -0.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 0.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTFT delivers a -16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for WBUY. FTFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBUY's 0.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTFT scores 5/9 vs WBUY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -57.5% | -11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.7% | -97.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -103.3% | -117.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.73x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$666,085 | -$457,223 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.78x | -228.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBUY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WBUY five years ago would be worth $2,491 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for FTFT. Over the past 12 months, FTFT leads with a -4.8% total return vs WBUY's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBUY at -37.1% vs FTFT's -52.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | +85.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.8% | -4.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | -89.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | -98.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.1% | -52.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBUY and FTFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WBUY is the less volatile stock with a 1.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTFT currently trades 34.5% from its 52-week high vs WBUY's 4.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.85 | $4.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $0.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.6% | +34.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 104K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FTFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WBUY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
WBUY vs FTFT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBUY or FTFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 7% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares (WBUY). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WBUY or FTFT?
Over the past 5 years, WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (WBUY) delivered a total return of -75. 1%, compared to -99. 2% for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WBUY returned -75. 1% versus FTFT's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WBUY or FTFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (WBUY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 56β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning FTFT is approximately 63% more volatile than WBUY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 73% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WBUY or FTFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus -67. 7% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares (WBUY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd. Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBUY leads at -25. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WBUY or FTFT?
WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (WBUY) is the more profitable company, earning -44. 9% net margin versus -120. 6% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -44. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WBUY leads at -35. 1% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTFT leads at 10. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WBUY or FTFT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is WBUY or FTFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WEBUY GLOBAL Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (WBUY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WBUY: -75. 1%, FTFT: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WBUY and FTFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBUY (Consumer Cyclical) and FTFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBUY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare FTFT vs RCON
RCON is one of the most direct listed alternatives to FTFT.
Compare WBUY vs CPNG
CPNG overlaps with WBUY in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With QFIN + BTBT
QFIN and BTBT are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.