Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WETH vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
WETH vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $22M | $151.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.53T | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 32.7% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 3.5x | 79.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $5.03B |
WETH vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wetouch Technology … (WETH) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 427.2 | +327.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WETH vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 38.68x
- Lower P/E (3.5x vs 79.7x)
- 20.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
WELL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 233.9% 10Y total return vs WETH's 109.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs WETH's 6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 79.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs WETH's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.8% vs WELL's +45.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18K% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 36.3% vs 0.5% |
WETH vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WETH vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WETH and WELL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 278.3x WETH's $42M. WETH is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WELL's 12.3%. On growth, WETH holds the edge at +999999.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.59T | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.53T | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +999999.0% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +22.5% |
Valuation Metrics
WETH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, WETH trades at a 98% valuation discount to WELL's 155.7x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $151.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$81M | $168.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.50x | 155.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 79.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -8.68x | 67.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 14.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 3.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.29x | 53.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WETH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WETH delivers a 18696.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18697 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WELL's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs WETH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18696.9% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18063.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +36.3% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$103M | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.96x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $336 for WETH. Over the past 12 months, WETH leads with a +93.8% total return vs WELL's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 43.3% vs WETH's -19.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.1% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +93.8% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.7% | +194.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +211.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.7% | +233.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.4% | +43.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WETH's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs WETH's 49.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.68 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.5% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
WELL is the only dividend payer here at 1.28% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WETH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WELL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
WETH vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WETH or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH). Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WETH or WELL?
On trailing P/E, Wetouch Technology Inc.
(WETH) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Welltower Inc. at 155. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WETH or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +211. 9%, compared to -96. 6% for Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +233. 9% versus WETH's +109. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WETH or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Wetouch Technology Inc. 's 1. 62β — meaning WETH is approximately 1121% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for Welltower Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WETH or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 6. 5% for Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Welltower Inc. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -40. 9% for Wetouch Technology Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WETH or WELL?
Wetouch Technology Inc.
(WETH) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WETH leads at 22. 0% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — WETH or WELL?
In this comparison, WELL (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. WETH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WETH or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +233. 9% 10Y return). Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +233. 9%, WETH: +109. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WETH and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WELL pays a dividend while WETH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.