WFRD
Weatherford International plc
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$7.77B
5Y Perf.+5318.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WFRD vs SLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$82.80B
5Y Perf.+198.6%
WFRD vs SLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WFRD | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $7.77B | $82.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.88B | $35.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $463M | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 45.9% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.0x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.75B | $12.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $3.04B |
WFRD vs SLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WFRD
SLB
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weatherford Interna… (WFRD) | 100 | 5418.5 | +5318.5% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 298.6 | +198.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WFRD vs SLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WFRD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SLB N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
The Long-Run Compounder
WFRD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 350.7% 10Y total return vs SLB's -9.2%
- Lower P/E (19.0x vs 20.6x)
- 9.5% margin vs SLB's 9.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Income Pick
SLB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 1.33x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLB | -1.6% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8% |
| Value | WFRD | Lower P/E (19.0x vs 20.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | WFRD | 9.5% margin vs SLB's 9.4% |
| Stability / Safety | SLB | Beta 0.87 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SLB | 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WFRD's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WFRD | +150.8% vs SLB's +67.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WFRD | 9.3% ROA vs SLB's 6.5%, ROIC 24.9% vs 12.1% |
WFRD vs SLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
WFRD vs SLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWFRDLAGGINGSLB
SLBSLB N.V.
1leads
WFRDWeatherford Internati…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SLBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WFRD4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WFRD7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WFRD5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SLB2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WFRD and SLB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 7.3x WFRD's $4.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.5% (WFRD) to 9.4% (SLB). On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $35.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $7.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $463M | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $466M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.7% | -31.2% |
Evenly matched — WFRD and SLB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
WFRD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, WFRD trades at a 22% valuation discount to SLB's 23.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WFRD's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.5x.
| Metric | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $82.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.5B | $92.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.27x | 23.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.01x | 20.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.29x | 12.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 3.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 17.27x |
WFRD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD delivers a 28.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $14 for SLB. SLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WFRD's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WFRD scores 6/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.3% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.3% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.9% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.03x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $709M | $9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.45x | 9.40x |
WFRD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFRD five years ago would be worth $98,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,434 for SLB. Over the past 12 months, WFRD leads with a +150.8% total return vs SLB's +67.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WFRD at 22.5% vs SLB's 7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.7% | +37.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +150.8% | +67.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.7% | +25.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +881.5% | +94.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +350.7% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.5% | +7.8% |
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WFRD and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLB is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFRD's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.22 | $57.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.58 | $31.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 16.2M |
Evenly matched — WFRD and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WFRD as "Buy" and SLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.2% upside for SLB (target: $57) vs -24.3% for WFRD (target: $82). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.95% vs WFRD's 0.92%.
| Metric | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | SLBSLB N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.00 | $56.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +2.9% |
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
WFRD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SLB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallWeatherford International p… (WFRD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WFRD vs SLB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WFRD or SLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). Weatherford International plc (WFRD) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weatherford International plc (WFRD) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WFRD or SLB?
On trailing P/E, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is the cheapest at 18.
3x versus SLB N. V. at 23. 5x. On forward P/E, Weatherford International plc is actually cheaper at 19. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WFRD or SLB?
Over the past 5 years, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) delivered a total return of +881.
5%, compared to +94. 3% for SLB N. V. (SLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFRD returned +350. 7% versus SLB's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WFRD or SLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Weatherford International plc's 1. 25β — meaning WFRD is approximately 44% more volatile than SLB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SLB N. V. (SLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 103% for Weatherford International plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WFRD or SLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SLB N.
V. (SLB) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weatherford International plc grew EPS -12. 1% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for SLB N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WFRD or SLB?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus 8. 8% for Weatherford International plc — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WFRD leads at 15. 4% versus 15. 3% for SLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WFRD leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WFRD or SLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) trades at 19.
0x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for SLB N. V. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLB: 3. 2% to $56. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — WFRD or SLB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD).
09Is WFRD or SLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLB: -9. 2%, WFRD: +350. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WFRD and SLB?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(WFRD: -3.4% · SLB: 5.0%)Net Margin>
%
(WFRD: 9.5% · SLB: 9.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(WFRD: 18.3x · SLB: 23.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.