Medical - Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WGRX vs CAH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Distribution
WGRX vs CAH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Distribution | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $8M | $43.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $250.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-73M | $1.56B |
| Gross Margin | 4.1% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | -12.1% | 0.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $25M | $9.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $3.87B |
WGRX vs CAH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wellgistics Health,… (WGRX) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Cardinal Health, In… (CAH) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WGRX vs CAH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, WGRX is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
CAH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth 87.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 158.8% 10Y total return vs WGRX's -97.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs WGRX's -91.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.6% margin vs WGRX's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs WGRX's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 20-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.1% vs WGRX's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs WGRX's -138.4%, ROIC 33.8% vs -32.2% |
WGRX vs CAH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WGRX vs CAH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAH is the larger business by revenue, generating $250.5B annually — 44589.6x WGRX's $6M. CAH is the more profitable business, keeping 0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WGRX's -13.0%. On growth, CAH holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $250.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$65M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$73M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.1% | +0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -130.5% | +1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.9% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | -19.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WGRX and CAH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $43.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $48.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.65x | 28.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.4% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.2% | +33.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -73.4% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.73x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $3.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.95x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAH five years ago would be worth $33,201 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $221 for WGRX. Over the past 12 months, CAH leads with a +26.1% total return vs WGRX's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAH at 31.1% vs WGRX's -71.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.6% | -10.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | +26.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +125.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +232.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +158.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.9% | +31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAH is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WGRX's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAH currently trades 78.6% from its 52-week high vs WGRX's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.04 | $233.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.08 | $137.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +78.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.1 | 28.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.8M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CAH is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $253.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% |
CAH leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
WGRX vs CAH: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WGRX or CAH a better buy right now?
Cardinal Health, Inc.
(CAH) offers the better valuation at 28. 5x trailing P/E (17. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WGRX or CAH?
Over the past 5 years, Cardinal Health, Inc.
(CAH) delivered a total return of +232. 0%, compared to -97. 8% for Wellgistics Health, Inc. (WGRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAH returned +158. 8% versus WGRX's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WGRX or CAH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cardinal Health, Inc.
(CAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Wellgistics Health, Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning WGRX is approximately 15109% more volatile than CAH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — WGRX or CAH?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cardinal Health, Inc.
grew EPS 87. 0% year-over-year, compared to -116. 7% for Wellgistics Health, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WGRX or CAH?
Cardinal Health, Inc.
(CAH) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 7% net margin versus -37. 8% for Wellgistics Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAH leads at 1. 0% versus -33. 9% for WGRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WGRX leads at 9. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WGRX or CAH?
In this comparison, CAH (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. WGRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WGRX or CAH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cardinal Health, Inc.
(CAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 1. 1% yield, +158. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAH: +158. 8%, WGRX: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WGRX and CAH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CAH pays a dividend while WGRX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.