Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WILC vs CENT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WILC
G. Willi-Food International Ltd.

Food Distribution

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$489M
5Y Perf.+147.4%
CENT
Central Garden & Pet Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.+34.1%

WILC vs CENT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WILC logoWILC
CENT logoCENT
IndustryFood DistributionPackaged Foods
Market Cap$489M$2.40B
Revenue (TTM)$598M$3.16B
Net Income (TTM)$95M$171M
Gross Margin28.5%32.2%
Operating Margin12.5%8.2%
Forward P/E20.1x13.5x
Total Debt$5M$1.44B
Cash & Equiv.$123M$882M

WILC vs CENTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WILC
CENT
StockMay 20May 26Return
G. Willi-Food Inter… (WILC)100247.4+147.4%
Central Garden & Pe… (CENT)100134.1+34.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WILC vs CENT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WILC leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Central Garden & Pet Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WILC
G. Willi-Food International Ltd.
The Growth Play

WILC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
  • 9.5% 10Y total return vs CENT's 161.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 8.74x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CENT
Central Garden & Pet Company
The Income Pick

CENT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65
  • Beta 0.65, current ratio 3.67x
  • Beta 0.65 vs WILC's 0.83
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWILC logoWILC6.0% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2%
ValueWILC logoWILCPEG 3.74 vs 4.52
Quality / MarginsWILC logoWILC15.8% margin vs CENT's 5.4%
Stability / SafetyCENT logoCENTBeta 0.65 vs WILC's 0.83
DividendsWILC logoWILC0.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WILC logoWILC+136.3% vs CENT's +11.8%
Efficiency (ROA)WILC logoWILC16.3% ROA vs CENT's 4.7%, ROIC 9.0% vs 9.1%

WILC vs CENT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WILCG. Willi-Food International Ltd.
FY 2024
Other
100.0%$73M
CENTCentral Garden & Pet Company
FY 2025
Pet Products Segment
57.6%$1.8B
Garden Products Segment
42.4%$1.3B

WILC vs CENT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCENTLAGGINGWILC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CENT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CENT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 5.3x WILC's $598M. WILC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CENT's 5.4%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$598M$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$82M$302M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$95M$171M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$21M$282M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.5%+32.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.5%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.8%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.5%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.0%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.0%+30.6%
CENT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CENT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 15.1x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 25% valuation discount to WILC's 20.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WILC offers better value at 3.74x vs CENT's 5.04x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Market CapShares × price$489M$2.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$448M$3.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.14x15.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.74x5.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.97x8.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.47x0.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.31x1.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.25x
CENT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

WILC delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $11 for CENT. WILC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CENT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs WILC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.5%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.3%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.3%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–958
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.91x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$118M$558M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$123M$882M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense67.29x1200.51x
WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WILC five years ago would be worth $17,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,277 for CENT. Over the past 12 months, WILC leads with a +136.3% total return vs CENT's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WILC at 40.0% vs CENT's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.1%+20.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+136.3%+11.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+174.3%+30.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.8%-17.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+951.8%+161.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+40.0%+9.4%
WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WILC and CENT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CENT is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WILC's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WILC currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs CENT's 93.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x0.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.00$41.30
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.20$28.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.5%+93.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10075.547.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3K74K
Evenly matched — WILC and CENT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

WILC is the only dividend payer here at 0.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$51.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts10
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.5%
CENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CENT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WILC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallCentral Garden & Pet Company (CENT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WILC vs CENT: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WILC or CENT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WILC or CENT?

On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 15.

1x versus G. Willi-Food International Ltd. at 20. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WILC or CENT?

Over the past 5 years, G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) delivered a total return of +73. 8%, compared to -17. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WILC returned +951. 8% versus CENT's +161. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WILC or CENT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus G. Willi-Food International Ltd. 's 0. 83β — meaning WILC is approximately 28% more volatile than CENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 91% for Central Garden & Pet Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WILC or CENT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: G. Willi-Food International Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to 57. 4% for Central Garden & Pet Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, WILC leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WILC or CENT?

G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 5. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WILC leads at 9. 5% versus 8. 5% for CENT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CENT leads at 31. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — WILC or CENT?

In this comparison, WILC (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. CENT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is WILC or CENT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 0. 7% yield, +951. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WILC: +951. 8%, CENT: +161. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between WILC and CENT?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WILC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock. WILC pays a dividend while CENT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WILC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CENT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WILC and CENT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WILC: 0.0% · CENT: 8.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(WILC: 15.8% · CENT: 5.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WILC: 20.1x · CENT: 15.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.