Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WIT vs DXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
WIT vs DXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $20.74B | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $900.02B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $135.47B | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 13.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 3.0x |
| Total Debt | $192.03B | $4.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121.97B | $1.80B |
WIT vs DXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wipro Limited (WIT) | 100 | 117.5 | +17.5% |
| DXC Technology Comp… (DXC) | 100 | 66.4 | -33.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WIT vs DXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WIT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 0.3% 10Y total return vs DXC's -48.8%
DXC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -22.4% vs WIT's -27.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.2% revenue growth vs DXC's -5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 3.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs DXC's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs DXC's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.4% vs WIT's -27.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs DXC's 0.1%, ROIC 13.4% vs 8.1% |
WIT vs DXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WIT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WIT is the larger business by revenue, generating $900.0B annually — 71.2x DXC's $12.6B. WIT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DXC's 0.1%. On growth, WIT holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $900.0B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $178.7B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $135.5B | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $145.9B | $939M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +13.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | -158.7% |
Valuation Metrics
DXC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, DXC trades at a 62% valuation discount to WIT's 15.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DXC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WIT's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.7B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.5B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.99x | 5.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.15x | 2.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.18x | 2.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 0.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.75x | 2.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WIT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WIT delivers a 15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for DXC. WIT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DXC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXC scores 8/9 vs WIT's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.7% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.3% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.2% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70.1B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $122.0B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $192.0B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.90x | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WIT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WIT five years ago would be worth $5,881 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,478 for DXC. Over the past 12 months, DXC leads with a -22.4% total return vs WIT's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WIT at -1.9% vs DXC's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.9% | -14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.5% | -22.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.7% | -46.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.2% | -65.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | -48.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.9% | -18.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WIT and DXC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WIT is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXC's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DXC currently trades 69.5% from its 52-week high vs WIT's 63.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.13 | $17.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.97 | $11.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.3% | +69.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.7 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.1M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
WIT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WIT as "Hold" and DXC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 271.2% upside for WIT (target: $7) vs 4.2% for DXC (target: $13). WIT is the only dividend payer here at 3.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.35 | $12.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.99 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
WIT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WIT vs DXC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WIT or DXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wipro Limited (WIT) is the stronger pick with -0.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for DXC Technology Company (DXC). DXC Technology Company (DXC) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E (3. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wipro Limited (WIT) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WIT or DXC?
On trailing P/E, DXC Technology Company (DXC) is the cheapest at 5.
7x versus Wipro Limited at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Wipro Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WIT or DXC?
Over the past 5 years, Wipro Limited (WIT) delivered a total return of -41.
2%, compared to -65. 2% for DXC Technology Company (DXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WIT returned -1. 0% versus DXC's -57. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WIT or DXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wipro Limited (WIT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus DXC Technology Company's 1. 28β — meaning DXC is approximately 100% more volatile than WIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wipro Limited (WIT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 130% for DXC Technology Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WIT or DXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wipro Limited (WIT) is pulling ahead at -0.
2% versus -5. 8% for DXC Technology Company (DXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DXC Technology Company grew EPS 356. 5% year-over-year, compared to 20. 4% for Wipro Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, WIT leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WIT or DXC?
Wipro Limited (WIT) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus 3. 0% for DXC Technology Company — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WIT leads at 17. 0% versus 5. 4% for DXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WIT leads at 30. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WIT or DXC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wipro Limited (WIT) trades at 0.
2x forward P/E versus 3. 0x for DXC Technology Company — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WIT: 271. 2% to $7. 35.
08Which pays a better dividend — WIT or DXC?
In this comparison, WIT (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. DXC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WIT or DXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wipro Limited (WIT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WIT: -1. 0%, DXC: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WIT and DXC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WIT pays a dividend while DXC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.