WKHS vs FDX

For growth investors, FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the stronger pick with 0.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). FedEx Corporation (FDX) offers the better valuation at 22. 4x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FedEx Corporation (FDX) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, FedEx Corporation (FDX) delivered a total return of +29.

0%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FDX returned +156. 2% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

03β versus Workhorse Group Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning WKHS is approximately 43% more volatile than FDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 133% for FedEx Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FedEx Corporation (FDX) is pulling ahead at 0.

3% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workhorse Group Inc. grew EPS 65. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 3% for FedEx Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

7% net margin versus -1538. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FDX leads at 6. 9% versus -1116. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FDX leads at 21. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, FDX (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. WKHS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

03), 1. 5% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FDX: +156. 2%, WKHS: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and FDX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

FDX pays a dividend while WKHS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.