Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WLK vs LYB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
WLK vs LYB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $13.42B | $25.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.98B | $22.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.64B | $-774M |
| Gross Margin | 1.5% | -19.3% |
| Operating Margin | -15.7% | -0.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.7x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $6.44B | $15.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.72B | $3.45B |
WLK vs LYB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westlake Corporation (WLK) | 100 | 209.1 | +109.1% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 117.0 | +17.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WLK vs LYB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WLK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -8.0%, EPS growth -352.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.9%
- 151.7% 10Y total return vs LYB's 55.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 69.3%, current ratio 2.24x
LYB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.0%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.0%, current ratio 1.77x
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 26.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -8.0% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 26.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.4% margin vs WLK's -14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs WLK's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs LYB's 7.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs WLK's +36.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.0% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC -1.1% vs -9.0% |
WLK vs LYB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WLK vs LYB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYB is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.5B annually — 2.0x WLK's $11.0B. LYB is the more profitable business, keeping -3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLK's -14.9%. On growth, WLK holds the edge at -6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.0B | $22.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$764M | $865M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | -$774M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$508M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -19.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | -0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.9% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LYB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.4B | $25.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.1B | $37.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.93x | -33.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.71x | 10.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 2.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYB delivers a -7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WLK. WLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYB's 1.56x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.8% | -7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.2% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.0% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | -1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.7B | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.4B | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.83x | -1.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLK five years ago would be worth $11,113 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,586 for LYB. Over the past 12 months, LYB leads with a +46.9% total return vs WLK's +36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYB at 0.2% vs WLK's -3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.0% | +76.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.7% | +46.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | +0.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.1% | -4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.7% | +55.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.0% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLK's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYB currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs WLK's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $124.23 | $83.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.33 | $41.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WLK and LYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WLK as "Hold" and LYB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -2.8% upside for WLK (target: $102) vs -5.3% for LYB (target: $74). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.05% vs WLK's 2.01%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $101.88 | $73.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +7.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.11 | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.8% |
LYB leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
WLK vs LYB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WLK or LYB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Westlake Corporation (WLK) is the stronger pick with -8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Analysts rate Westlake Corporation (WLK) a "Hold" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WLK or LYB?
Over the past 5 years, Westlake Corporation (WLK) delivered a total return of +11.
1%, compared to -4. 1% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLK returned +138. 6% versus LYB's +55. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WLK or LYB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Westlake Corporation's 1. 06β — meaning WLK is approximately 178% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Corporation (WLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 156% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WLK or LYB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westlake Corporation (WLK) is pulling ahead at -8.
0% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LyondellBasell Industries N. V. grew EPS -156. 6% year-over-year, compared to -352. 8% for Westlake Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLK leads at -10. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WLK or LYB?
LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 5% net margin versus -13. 5% for Westlake Corporation — meaning it keeps -2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYB leads at -1. 1% versus -14. 1% for WLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LYB leads at 9. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WLK or LYB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 7x for Westlake Corporation — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLK: -2. 8% to $101. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — WLK or LYB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 2. 0% for Westlake Corporation (WLK).
08Is WLK or LYB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 7. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +55. 5%, WLK: +138. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WLK and LYB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.