WLK
Westlake Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$12.47B
5Y Perf.+104.2%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WLK vs OLN vs LYB vs HUN vs EMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
OLN
Olin Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+122.4%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$23.04B
5Y Perf.+12.1%
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
Chemicals
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.-18.8%
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$8.43B
5Y Perf.+8.2%
WLK vs OLN vs LYB vs HUN vs EMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WLK | OLN | LYB | HUN | EMN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $12.47B | $3.05B | $23.04B | $2.56B | $8.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.98B | $6.72B | $22.48B | $5.69B | $8.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.64B | $-127M | $-774M | $-324M | $399M |
| Gross Margin | 1.5% | 5.3% | -19.3% | 12.9% | 19.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.5% | -1.6% | -0.9% | -1.0% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | — | 9.9x | — | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $6.44B | $3.39B | $15.96B | $2.73B | $5.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.72B | $168M | $3.45B | $429M | $566M |
WLK vs OLN vs LYB vs HUN vs EMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WLK
OLN
LYB
HUN
EMN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westlake Corporation (WLK) | 100 | 204.2 | +104.2% |
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 222.4 | +122.4% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Eastman Chemical Co… (EMN) | 100 | 108.2 | +8.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WLK vs OLN vs LYB vs HUN vs EMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LYB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Eastman Chemical Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. OLN and HUN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WLK
Westlake Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
WLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 142.4% 10Y total return vs OLN's 61.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 69.3%, current ratio 2.24x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
OLN
Olin Corporation
The Growth Play
OLN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -140.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.2%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
Best for: growth exposure
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
The Income Pick
LYB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.7%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.7%, current ratio 1.77x
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.5x)
- Beta 0.38 vs HUN's 1.73
Best for: income & stability and defensive
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
The Momentum Pick
HUN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.5% vs EMN's +2.3%
Best for: momentum
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
The Quality Compounder
EMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 4.6% margin vs WLK's -14.9%
- 2.6% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 6.7% vs -9.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OLN | 3.7% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% |
| Value | LYB | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | EMN | 4.6% margin vs WLK's -14.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LYB | Beta 0.38 vs HUN's 1.73 |
| Dividends | LYB | 7.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EMN's 4.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HUN | +37.5% vs EMN's +2.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EMN | 2.6% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 6.7% vs -9.0% |
WLK vs OLN vs LYB vs HUN vs EMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
WLK vs OLN vs LYB vs HUN vs EMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMNLAGGINGHUN
Who Leads Where
EMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
OLN leads 1 • WLK leads 0 • LYB leads 0 • HUN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓HUNHuntsman Corporation
0leads
LYBLyondellBasell Indust…
0leads
WLKWestlake Corporation
0leads
OLNOlin Corporation
1leads
EMNEastman Chemical Comp…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OLNvs WLKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EMN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OLN3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EMN6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYB is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.5B annually — 3.9x HUN's $5.7B. EMN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLK's -14.9%. On growth, HUN holds the edge at +0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | LYBLyondellBasell In… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.0B | $6.7B | $22.5B | $5.7B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$462M | $284M | $865M | $160M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | -$127M | -$774M | -$324M | $399M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$508M | $352M | $3.1B | $135M | $498M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +5.3% | -19.3% | +12.9% | +19.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.5% | -1.6% | -0.9% | -1.0% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.9% | -1.9% | -3.4% | -5.7% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +5.2% | +13.6% | +2.4% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.8% | -3.7% | -100.0% | +0.7% | -4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -61.8% | -100.0% | -3.3% | -40.8% |
EMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OLN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EMN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 33.4x.
| Metric | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | LYBLyondellBasell In… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.5B | $3.0B | $23.0B | $2.6B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.2B | $6.3B | $35.5B | $4.9B | $12.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.30x | -72.32x | -30.43x | -9.27x | 17.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.08x | — | 9.92x | — | 12.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 5.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.88x | 33.44x | 19.64x | 8.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.12x | 0.45x | 0.76x | 0.45x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.59x | 2.26x | 0.86x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.29x | 59.99x | 22.11x | 19.87x |
OLN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMN delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WLK. WLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OLN's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OLN scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | LYBLyondellBasell In… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.8% | -6.6% | -7.2% | -8.1% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.2% | -1.7% | -3.0% | -4.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.0% | +1.7% | -1.1% | -0.6% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +1.9% | -1.1% | -0.7% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 1.76x | 1.56x | 0.92x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $3.2B | $12.5B | $2.3B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.7B | $168M | $3.4B | $429M | $566M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.4B | $3.4B | $16.0B | $2.7B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.17x | 0.66x | -1.42x | -1.08x | 2.22x |
EMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WLK and EMN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLK five years ago would be worth $10,229 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,018 for HUN. Over the past 12 months, HUN leads with a +37.5% total return vs EMN's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EMN at 1.1% vs OLN's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | LYBLyondellBasell In… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.0% | +25.1% | +62.6% | +45.5% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.6% | +35.2% | +37.2% | +37.5% | +2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | -46.8% | -5.5% | -33.3% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.3% | -33.9% | -11.3% | -39.8% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.4% | +61.0% | +48.6% | +57.6% | +35.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.5% | -19.0% | -1.9% | -12.6% | +1.1% |
Evenly matched — WLK and EMN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYB and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUN's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs WLK's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | LYBLyondellBasell In… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.47x | 0.38x | 1.73x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $124.23 | $30.46 | $83.94 | $15.89 | $84.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.33 | $18.08 | $41.58 | $7.30 | $56.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +87.8% | +85.2% | +92.7% | +87.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.2 | 58.6 | 50.9 | 65.4 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.7M | 8.1M | 6.2M | 1.5M |
Evenly matched — LYB and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WLK and LYB and EMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WLK as "Hold", OLN as "Hold", LYB as "Hold", HUN as "Hold", EMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.9% upside for EMN (target: $77) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.66% vs WLK's 2.17%.
| Metric | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | LYBLyondellBasell In… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $101.88 | $24.33 | $73.60 | $12.00 | $77.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 35 | 39 | 33 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +3.0% | +7.7% | +5.7% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.11 | $0.80 | $5.48 | $0.85 | $3.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +1.7% | +0.9% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
Evenly matched — WLK and LYB and EMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OLN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallEastman Chemical Company (EMN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WLK vs OLN vs LYB vs HUN vs EMN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN?
On forward P/E, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN?
Over the past 5 years, Westlake Corporation (WLK) delivered a total return of +2.
3%, compared to -39. 8% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLK returned +142. 4% versus EMN's +35. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Huntsman Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning HUN is approximately 355% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Corporation (WLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 176% for Olin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntsman Corporation grew EPS -44. 5% year-over-year, compared to -352. 8% for Westlake Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMN leads at -6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN?
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus -13. 5% for Westlake Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMN leads at 10. 6% versus -14. 1% for WLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMN leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Westlake Corporation — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMN: 4. 9% to $77. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB) offers the highest yield at 7. 7%, versus 2. 2% for Westlake Corporation (WLK).
09Is WLK or OLN or LYB or HUN or EMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 7. 7% yield). Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +48. 6%, HUN: +57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WLK and OLN and LYB and HUN and EMN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EMN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(WLK: -6.8% · OLN: -3.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.