WLKP vs OLN

For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP). Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) offers the better valuation at 2. 8x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) delivered a total return of +21.

3%, compared to -29. 4% for Olin Corporation (OLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLKP returned +98. 8% versus OLN's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

26β versus Olin Corporation's 1. 47β — meaning OLN is approximately 464% more volatile than WLKP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 176% for Olin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.

7% versus 2. 7% for Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westlake Chemical Partners LP grew EPS 378. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 7% for Olin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLKP leads at -9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) is the more profitable company, earning 25.

6% net margin versus -0. 6% for Olin Corporation — meaning it keeps 25. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLKP leads at 27. 4% versus 1. 7% for OLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLKP leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLKP: 23.

7% to $29. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) offers the highest yield at 8. 0%, versus 2. 8% for Olin Corporation (OLN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

26), 8. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WLKP: +98. 8%, OLN: +67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WLKP is a small-cap deep-value stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.