Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WMB vs TRGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
WMB vs TRGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $89.22B | $54.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.92B | $16.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.84B | $2.13B |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 22.1% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | 21.1% |
| Forward P/E | 31.2x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $29.36B | $17.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $166M |
WMB vs TRGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Williams Compan… (WMB) | 100 | 357.1 | +257.1% |
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 1411.1 | +1311.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMB vs TRGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, current ratio 0.53x
TRGP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs WMB's 371.1%
- Lower P/E (24.9x vs 31.2x)
- +61.6% vs WMB's +27.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.9x vs 31.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs TRGP's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs TRGP's 0.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs TRGP's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs WMB's +27.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs WMB's 4.9%, ROIC 13.2% vs 7.7% |
WMB vs TRGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMB vs TRGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRGP and WMB operate at a comparable scale, with $16.4B and $11.9B in trailing revenue. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRGP's 13.0%. On growth, WMB holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.9B | $16.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.8B | $5.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.8B | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $722M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +22.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +21.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.6% | -15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.6% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRGP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.6x trailing earnings, TRGP trades at a 13% valuation discount to WMB's 34.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRGP's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMB's 17.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89.2B | $54.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $118.5B | $71.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.09x | 29.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.23x | 24.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.56x | 14.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.47x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.94x | 16.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 88.77x | 92.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP delivers a 70.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $19 for WMB. WMB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRGP's 5.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMB scores 7/9 vs TRGP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +70.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +13.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.96x | 5.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.3B | $17.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.4B | $17.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.37x | 6.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $32,449 for WMB. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs WMB's +27.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs WMB's 38.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.7% | +36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | +61.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.3% | +268.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +224.5% | +592.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +371.1% | +618.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.6% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMB and TRGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRGP's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.41 | $261.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.82 | $144.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.8M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
WMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WMB as "Buy" and TRGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for WMB (target: $79) vs -5.8% for TRGP (target: $238). For income investors, WMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.74% vs TRGP's 1.51%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.00 | $237.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $3.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
TRGP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WMB leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WMB vs TRGP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMB or TRGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) offers the better valuation at 29. 6x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMB or TRGP?
On trailing P/E, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the cheapest at 29. 6x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Targa Resources Corp. is actually cheaper at 24. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMB or TRGP?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to +224. 5% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +618. 0% versus WMB's +371. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMB or TRGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Targa Resources Corp. 's 0. 29β — meaning TRGP is approximately 73% more volatile than WMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 196% versus 5% for Targa Resources Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMB or TRGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Targa Resources Corp. grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to 17. 6% for The Williams Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMB leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMB or TRGP?
The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 10. 8% for Targa Resources Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 20. 1% for TRGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMB leads at 42. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMB or TRGP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) trades at 24. 9x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMB: 8. 3% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMB or TRGP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).
09Is WMB or TRGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 1. 5% yield, +618. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +618. 0%, WMB: +371. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMB and TRGP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.