Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WMB vs TRGP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$89.22B
5Y Perf.+257.1%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$54.26B
5Y Perf.+1311.1%

WMB vs TRGP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WMB logoWMB
TRGP logoTRGP
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$89.22B$54.26B
Revenue (TTM)$11.92B$16.38B
Net Income (TTM)$2.84B$2.13B
Gross Margin62.8%22.1%
Operating Margin38.8%21.1%
Forward P/E31.2x24.9x
Total Debt$29.36B$17.55B
Cash & Equiv.$63M$166M

WMB vs TRGPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WMB
TRGP
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Williams Compan… (WMB)100357.1+257.1%
Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP)1001411.1+1311.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WMB vs TRGP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WMB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Targa Resources Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
The Income Pick

WMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 2.7%
  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.17, current ratio 0.53x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

TRGP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 6.2% 10Y total return vs WMB's 371.1%
  • Lower P/E (24.9x vs 31.2x)
  • +61.6% vs WMB's +27.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWMB logoWMB13.8% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1%
ValueTRGP logoTRGPLower P/E (24.9x vs 31.2x)
Quality / MarginsWMB logoWMB23.8% margin vs TRGP's 13.0%
Stability / SafetyWMB logoWMBBeta 0.17 vs TRGP's 0.29, lower leverage
DividendsWMB logoWMB2.7% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs TRGP's 1.5%
Momentum (1Y)TRGP logoTRGP+61.6% vs WMB's +27.2%
Efficiency (ROA)TRGP logoTRGP8.5% ROA vs WMB's 4.9%, ROIC 13.2% vs 7.7%

WMB vs TRGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Gas & NGL Marketing Services
71.6%$7.2B
West
28.4%$2.8B
TRGPTarga Resources Corp.
FY 2025
Logistics And Transportation
66.4%$14.6B
Gathering And Processing
33.8%$7.4B
Corporate Non Segment And Inter Segment Elimination
-0.1%$-32,400,000

WMB vs TRGP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTRGPLAGGINGWMB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TRGP and WMB operate at a comparable scale, with $16.4B and $11.9B in trailing revenue. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRGP's 13.0%. On growth, WMB holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$11.9B$16.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.8B$5.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.8B$2.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$722M$1.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.8%+22.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+38.8%+21.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.8%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.1%+7.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.6%-15.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.6%-100.0%
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TRGP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 29.6x trailing earnings, TRGP trades at a 13% valuation discount to WMB's 34.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRGP's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMB's 17.6x.

MetricWMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…
Market CapShares × price$89.2B$54.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$118.5B$71.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.09x29.63x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.23x24.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.56x14.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.47x3.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.94x16.97x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF88.77x92.90x
TRGP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TRGP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

TRGP delivers a 70.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $19 for WMB. WMB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRGP's 5.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMB scores 7/9 vs TRGP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.0%+70.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.9%+8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+13.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.7%+16.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.96x5.49x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$29.3B$17.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63M$166M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$29.4B$17.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.37x6.52x
TRGP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $32,449 for WMB. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs WMB's +27.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs WMB's 38.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.7%+36.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.2%+61.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+166.3%+268.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+224.5%+592.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+371.1%+618.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+38.6%+54.4%
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WMB and TRGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRGP's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricWMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.17x0.29x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$77.41$261.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$55.82$144.14
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.2%+96.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.854.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.8M1.3M
Evenly matched — WMB and TRGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates WMB as "Buy" and TRGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for WMB (target: $79) vs -5.8% for TRGP (target: $238). For income investors, WMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.74% vs TRGP's 1.51%.

MetricWMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$79.00$237.70
# AnalystsCovering analysts3433
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises84
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.00$3.81
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.2%
WMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TRGP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WMB leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallTarga Resources Corp. (TRGP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WMB vs TRGP: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WMB or TRGP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) offers the better valuation at 29. 6x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WMB or TRGP?

On trailing P/E, Targa Resources Corp.

(TRGP) is the cheapest at 29. 6x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Targa Resources Corp. is actually cheaper at 24. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WMB or TRGP?

Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.

(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to +224. 5% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +618. 0% versus WMB's +371. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WMB or TRGP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Targa Resources Corp. 's 0. 29β — meaning TRGP is approximately 73% more volatile than WMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 196% versus 5% for Targa Resources Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WMB or TRGP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Targa Resources Corp. grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to 17. 6% for The Williams Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMB leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WMB or TRGP?

The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 10. 8% for Targa Resources Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 20. 1% for TRGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMB leads at 42. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WMB or TRGP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Targa Resources Corp.

(TRGP) trades at 24. 9x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMB: 8. 3% to $79. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WMB or TRGP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).

09

Is WMB or TRGP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.

(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 1. 5% yield, +618. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +618. 0%, WMB: +371. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WMB and TRGP?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRGP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WMB and TRGP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WMB: -0.6% · TRGP: -15.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(WMB: 23.8% · TRGP: 13.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WMB: 34.1x · TRGP: 29.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.