Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WORX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HCAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
WORX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HCAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $202K | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $113M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $311M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-168M | $153M | $-178M |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | — | 65.4% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | -33.3% | — | 12.3% | -51.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $2K | $22M | $70M | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $194M | $1.12B | $51M |
WORX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HCAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCWorx Corp. (WORX) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 206.1 | +106.1% |
| Health Catalyst, In… (HCAT) | 100 | 4.6 | -95.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WORX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HCAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WORX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.77
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs WORX's -91.2%
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs WORX's -154.4%
HCAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.5%, EPS growth -121.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 1.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs WORX's -154.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs HCAT's 2.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs WORX's -91.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
WORX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HCAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WORX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HCAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories
WORX leads 2 • DBVT leads 0 • HCAT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WORX's -154.4%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $0 | $1.6B | $311M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $972,248 | -$112M | $212M | -$110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$168M | $153M | -$178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$151M | $392M | -$5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | — | +65.4% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.3% | — | +12.3% | -51.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -154.4% | — | +9.8% | -57.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -54.0% | — | +25.1% | -1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | — | +28.2% | -6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.6% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WORX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $202,035 | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $113M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $82M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -0.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | — | 4.00x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 0.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. WORX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.5% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -54.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -61.6% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.5% | — | +18.9% | -32.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -34.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $194M | $1.1B | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1,539 | $22M | $70M | $20M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | -189.82x | 32.30x | -4.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DBVT and ALKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23 for WORX. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs WORX's -91.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs WORX's -76.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -75.8% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -30.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.2% | +110.4% | +16.5% | -59.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -86.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -97.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -95.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.9% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -49.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCAT's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs WORX's 5.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 2.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.05 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $5.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $0.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.7% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +31.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 18.6 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 252K | 2.3M | 720K |
Analyst Outlook
WORX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", HCAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $44.00 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 28 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +4.4% |
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WORX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WORX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HCAT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Health Catalyst, Inc.
(HCAT) is the stronger pick with 1. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -99. 8% for SCWorx Corp. (WORX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -11. 0% versus WORX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus Health Catalyst, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning HCAT is approximately 93% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SCWorx Corp. (WORX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Health Catalyst, Inc.
(HCAT) is pulling ahead at 1. 5% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SCWorx Corp. grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -154. 4% for SCWorx Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -51. 7% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is WORX or DBVT or ALKS or HCAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
06)). Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKS: -11. 0%, HCAT: -95. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WORX and DBVT and ALKS and HCAT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.