Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WOW vs ATUS vs CHTR vs CABO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
WOW vs ATUS vs CHTR vs CABO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $446M | $539M | $20.29B | $345M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $591M | $8.59B | $54.64B | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $-1.87B | $5.13B | $-260M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 51.6% | 43.3% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | -1.3% | 24.1% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 3.8x | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $250M | $97.12B | $3.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $1.01B | $477M | $153M |
WOW vs ATUS vs CHTR vs CABO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
| Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) | 100 | 7.4 | -92.6% |
| Charter Communicati… (CHTR) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
| Cable One, Inc. (CABO) | 100 | 6.2 | -93.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WOW vs ATUS vs CHTR vs CABO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WOW is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 0.61x
- +21.8% vs CABO's -65.2%
ATUS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.80
CHTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.6%, EPS growth 3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- -24.9% 10Y total return vs WOW's -68.5%
- -0.6% revenue growth vs WOW's -8.1%
- 9.4% margin vs ATUS's -21.8%
CABO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 0.40x
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 3.8x)
- 5.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.6% revenue growth vs WOW's -8.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 3.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs ATUS's -21.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs ATUS's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs CABO's -65.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs ATUS's -156.2%, ROIC 8.6% vs -0.8% |
WOW vs ATUS vs CHTR vs CABO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WOW vs ATUS vs CHTR vs CABO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ATUS leads 2 • CABO leads 1 • WOW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $54.6B annually — 92.5x WOW's $591M. CHTR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATUS's -21.8%. On growth, CHTR holds the edge at -1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $591M | $8.6B | $54.6B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $212M | $1.6B | $20.9B | $730M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | -$1.9B | $5.1B | -$260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$68M | $163M | $4.0B | -$167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +51.6% | +43.3% | +39.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -1.3% | +24.1% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | -21.8% | +9.4% | -17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +1.9% | +7.4% | -11.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.9% | -2.3% | -1.0% | -7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -59.3% | -25.0% | +8.9% | +12.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CABO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CABO's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATUS's 7.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $446M | $539M | $20.3B | $345M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $25.6B | $116.9B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.22x | -8.59x | 4.43x | -0.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 3.80x | 2.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.68x | 7.70x | 5.31x | 4.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 0.06x | 0.37x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | — | 1.08x | 0.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.61x | 4.59x | 1.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR delivers a 25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-53 for WOW. CABO carries lower financial leverage with a 2.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WOW's 4.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHTR scores 7/9 vs CABO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.7% | — | +25.2% | -18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | -156.2% | +3.3% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | -0.8% | +8.6% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -0.8% | +9.6% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.98x | — | 4.73x | 2.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | -$762M | $96.6B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $1.0B | $477M | $153M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $250M | $97.1B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.07x | — | 2.48x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WOW five years ago would be worth $3,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $509 for ATUS. Over the past 12 months, WOW leads with a +21.8% total return vs CABO's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATUS at -14.3% vs CABO's -50.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +9.9% | -23.4% | -41.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.8% | -28.7% | -60.4% | -65.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.4% | -37.0% | -54.3% | -87.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.3% | -94.9% | -76.9% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -88.0% | -24.9% | -70.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.5% | -14.3% | -23.0% | -50.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WOW and CHTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATUS's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WOW currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs CABO's 32.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.80x | 0.33x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.25 | $2.98 | $437.06 | $186.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.06 | $1.59 | $156.00 | $53.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +63.4% | +36.7% | +32.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 57.9 | 28.2 | 23.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 573K | 956K | 2.3M | 151K |
Analyst Outlook
ATUS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WOW as "Hold", ATUS as "Buy", CHTR as "Buy", CABO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 73.1% upside for CHTR (target: $277) vs 31.6% for CABO (target: $80). CABO is the only dividend payer here at 5.03% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 | $277.40 | $80.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 36 | 55 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +5.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +25.3% | 0.0% |
CHTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATUS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WOW vs ATUS vs CHTR vs CABO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the stronger pick with -0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW). Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO?
On forward P/E, Cable One, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 2. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO?
Over the past 5 years, WideOpenWest, Inc.
(WOW) delivered a total return of -67. 3%, compared to -94. 9% for Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHTR returned -24. 9% versus ATUS's -88. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Altice USA, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning ATUS is approximately 444% more volatile than CHTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cable One, Inc. (CABO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for WideOpenWest, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is pulling ahead at -0. 6% versus -8. 1% for WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WideOpenWest, Inc. grew EPS 79. 6% year-over-year, compared to -25. 5% for Cable One, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO?
Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus -23. 7% for Cable One, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CABO leads at 26. 5% versus -1. 3% for ATUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WOW leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cable One, Inc.
(CABO) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 3. 8x for Charter Communications, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHTR: 73. 1% to $277. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO?
In this comparison, CABO (5.
0% yield) pays a dividend. WOW, ATUS, CHTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WOW or ATUS or CHTR or CABO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cable One, Inc.
(CABO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 5. 0% yield). Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CABO: -70. 3%, ATUS: -88. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WOW and ATUS and CHTR and CABO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WOW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CABO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CABO pays a dividend while WOW, ATUS, CHTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 23%
- Dividend Yield > 2.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.