WS vs CMC

For growth investors, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the stronger pick with -1.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 8% for Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS). Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Worthington Steel, Inc.

(WS) is the cheapest at 18. 5x versus Commercial Metals Company at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) delivered a total return of +127.

3%, compared to +67. 5% for Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMC returned +356. 4% versus WS's +67. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

53β versus Worthington Steel, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning WS is approximately 25% more volatile than CMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 32% for Commercial Metals Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is pulling ahead at -1.

6% versus -9. 8% for Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Worthington Steel, Inc. grew EPS -29. 6% year-over-year, compared to -82. 1% for Commercial Metals Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMC leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Worthington Steel, Inc.

(WS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMC leads at 6. 7% versus 4. 8% for WS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMC leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 10.

8x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Worthington Steel, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMC: 17. 4% to $82. 75.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 1. 0% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

0% yield, +356. 4% 10Y return). Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMC: +356. 4%, WS: +67. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.