Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WT vs MORN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
WT vs MORN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $2.65B | $6.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $494M | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $109M | $403M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 61.0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.3% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $957M | $1.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $312M | $475M |
WT vs MORN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WisdomTree, Inc. (WT) | 100 | 626.4 | +526.4% |
| Morningstar, Inc. (MORN) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WT vs MORN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 127.3%
- 15.4% NII/revenue growth vs MORN's 7.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MORN's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
MORN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 1.0%
- 131.7% 10Y total return vs WT's 92.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 0.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% NII/revenue growth vs MORN's 7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 17.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MORN's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs WT's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WT's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.1% vs MORN's -39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MORN's 0.4% |
WT vs MORN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WT vs MORN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MORN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 5.0x WT's $494M. WT is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MORN's 15.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $494M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $179M | $763M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $109M | $403M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $149M | $437M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.1% | +61.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.3% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MORN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, MORN trades at a 20% valuation discount to WT's 25.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MORN's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WT's 18.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.97x | 20.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.30x | 14.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.53x | 10.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.37x | 2.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.56x | 6.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.77x | 15.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MORN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MORN delivers a 30.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $26 for WT. MORN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WT's 2.31x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.5% | +30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.2% | +20.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.31x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $645M | $933M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $312M | $475M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $957M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.54x | 12.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WT five years ago would be worth $27,380 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,093 for MORN. Over the past 12 months, WT leads with a +103.1% total return vs MORN's -39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WT at 43.0% vs MORN's -0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.0% | -15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.1% | -39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.3% | -2.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.8% | -29.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +131.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.0% | -0.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WT and MORN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MORN is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs MORN's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.29 | $316.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.10 | $149.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +56.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 42.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 509K |
Analyst Outlook
MORN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WT as "Buy" and MORN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for MORN (target: $237) vs -0.2% for WT (target: $19). For income investors, MORN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.02% vs WT's 0.64%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.70 | $236.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +11.6% |
MORN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
WT vs MORN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WT or MORN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WisdomTree, Inc.
(WT) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Morningstar, Inc. (MORN). Morningstar, Inc. (MORN) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WisdomTree, Inc. (WT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WT or MORN?
On trailing P/E, Morningstar, Inc.
(MORN) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus WisdomTree, Inc. at 25. 0x. On forward P/E, Morningstar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WT or MORN?
Over the past 5 years, WisdomTree, Inc.
(WT) delivered a total return of +173. 8%, compared to -29. 1% for Morningstar, Inc. (MORN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MORN returned +131. 7% versus WT's +92. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WT or MORN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Morningstar, Inc.
(MORN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus WisdomTree, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning WT is approximately 177% more volatile than MORN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Morningstar, Inc. (MORN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 115% versus 2% for WisdomTree, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WT or MORN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WisdomTree, Inc.
(WT) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus 7. 5% for Morningstar, Inc. (MORN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WisdomTree, Inc. grew EPS 127. 3% year-over-year, compared to 3. 4% for Morningstar, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WT or MORN?
WisdomTree, Inc.
(WT) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 15. 3% for Morningstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WT leads at 35. 3% versus 21. 5% for MORN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WT leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WT or MORN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Morningstar, Inc.
(MORN) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for WisdomTree, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MORN: 32. 9% to $236. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WT or MORN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Morningstar, Inc. (MORN) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 6% for WisdomTree, Inc. (WT).
09Is WT or MORN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Morningstar, Inc.
(MORN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 1. 0% yield, +131. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MORN: +131. 7%, WT: +92. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WT and MORN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MORN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.